VNQ vs. IWF

Last updated Jun 12, 2026

VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) and IWF (iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while IWF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNQ returned 5.53%/yr vs 18.15%/yr for IWF. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNQ charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IWF.

Performance

VNQ vs. IWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly higher than IWF's 2.83% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed IWF with an annualized return of 5.53%, while IWF has yielded a comparatively higher 18.15% annualized return.

VNQ

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 11.49%
• 6M: 11.16%
• 1Y: 12.43%
• 3Y*: 10.04%
• 5Y*: 2.36%
• 10Y*: 5.53%

IWF

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: -1.44%
• YTD: 2.83%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 19.30%
• 3Y*: 22.57%
• 5Y*: 13.90%
• 10Y*: 18.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQ vs. IWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF	11.49%	3.24%	4.81%	11.85%	-26.25%	40.54%	-4.61%	28.91%	-6.03%	4.90%
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	2.83%	18.33%	33.12%	42.59%	-29.31%	27.43%	38.25%	35.86%	-1.67%	29.95%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQ and IWF is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004	0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between VNQ and IWF has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VNQ vs. IWF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VNQ	IWF
Real Estate	97.3%	0.4%
Basic Materials	1.1%	0.3%
Communication Services	0.6%	12.3%
Technology	0.3%	53.2%
Energy	0.1%	0.4%
Financial Services	0.1%	4.9%
Industrials	0.0%	5.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.5%
Healthcare	-	7.0%
Utilities	-	1.1%

Return for Risk

VNQ vs. IWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQ

VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 32
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 29
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 36

IWF

IWF Risk / Return Rank: 36
IWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
IWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
IWF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
IWF Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQ vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VNQ	IWF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	1.21	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	1.70	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.22	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	1.19	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.71	3.93	+0.78

VNQ vs. IWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the IWF Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQ and IWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VNQ vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than IWF's maximum drawdown of -64.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and IWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	VNQ	IWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.07%	-64.25%	-8.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	-16.27%	+7.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.46%	-23.36%	+5.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.48%	-32.72%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.40%	-32.72%	-9.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-5.59%	+5.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.61%	-22.06%	+8.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	4.92%	-2.27%

Volatility

VNQ vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is 4.74%, while iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that VNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VNQ	IWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.74%	5.43%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.74%	12.40%	-2.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.52%	15.96%	-2.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.85%	21.47%	-2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.72%	21.01%	-0.29%

VNQ vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than IWF's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VNQ vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison

VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than IWF's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.35%	0.36%	0.46%	0.67%	0.91%	0.49%	0.66%	0.99%	1.27%	1.10%	1.43%	1.37%
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF	3.57%	3.92%	3.85%	3.95%	3.91%	2.56%	3.93%	3.39%	4.74%	4.23%	4.82%	3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VNQ and IWF in my portfolio?

VNQ and IWF have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VNQ or IWF?

IWF has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to VNQ (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs IWF's -64.25%.

Which ETF is better, VNQ or IWF?

On 10-year performance, IWF leads with 18.15% vs 5.53% for VNQ. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VNQ or IWF?

Over the 10-year period, IWF has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VNQ or IWF?

VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IWF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VNQ or IWF?

VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 0.35% for IWF.

What is the main difference between VNQ and IWF?

VNQ is categorized as REIT, while IWF is Large Cap Growth Equities. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while IWF tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.18% for IWF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.