VLUE vs. FNDF
VLUE (iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VLUE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VLUE returned 15.38%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for FNDF. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VLUE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.
Performance
VLUE vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLUE achieves a 45.72% return, which is significantly higher than FNDF's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VLUE has outperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 15.38%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.34% annualized return.
VLUE
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- YTD
- 45.72%
- 6M
- 46.53%
- 1Y
- 85.32%
- 3Y*
- 31.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 15.38%
FNDF
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 21.60%
- 1Y
- 41.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
VLUE vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 45.72% | 32.67% | 7.25% | 14.26% | -14.17% | 28.93% | -0.23% | 27.20% | -11.13% | 21.95% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 19.66% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | 14.97% | 3.61% | 18.46% | -14.21% | 23.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLUE and FNDF is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.75 |
The correlation between VLUE and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
VLUE vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VLUE
FNDF
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VLUE
FNDF
Financial Services
VLUE
FNDF
Consumer Cyclical
VLUE
FNDF
Communication Services
VLUE
FNDF
Industrials
VLUE
FNDF
Healthcare
VLUE
FNDF
Consumer Defensive
VLUE
FNDF
Energy
VLUE
FNDF
Utilities
VLUE
FNDF
Real Estate
VLUE
FNDF
Basic Materials
VLUE
FNDF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLUE vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank
VLUE
FNDF
VLUE vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VLUE | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | 1.45 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.25 | 3.82 | +5.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.16 | 14.27 | +24.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VLUE vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLUE drawdown since its inception was -39.47%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLUE and FNDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLUE | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.47% | -40.14% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -10.60% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | -13.89% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.12% | -25.56% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.47% | -40.14% | +0.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.61% | -1.94% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.01% | -7.63% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.84% | -0.71% |
Volatility
VLUE vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) at 6.65%. This indicates that VLUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLUE | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 6.65% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 13.64% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.38% | 16.00% | +2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 16.35% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 17.71% | +2.20% |
VLUE vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VLUE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VLUE vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
VLUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than FNDF's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 2.87% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 1.43% | 2.11% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.70% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VLUE and FNDF have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLUE has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to FNDF (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLUE dropped -39.47% vs FNDF's -40.14%.
On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 15.38% vs 12.34% for FNDF. On fees, VLUE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FNDF has been the lower-risk option at 6.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 15.38% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VLUE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.
FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.43% for VLUE.
VLUE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VLUE tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VLUE and 0.25% for FNDF.
VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.55 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VLUE and FNDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer