PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLU vs. GCOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VLU vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VLU vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
2.50%16.70%17.24%17.18%-8.24%30.95%9.91%26.20%-7.89%18.16%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
13.21%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.33%17.81%-7.99%20.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLU achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 13.21% return. Over the past 10 years, VLU has outperformed GCOW with an annualized return of 13.18%, while GCOW has yielded a comparatively lower 10.20% annualized return.


VLU

1D
2.04%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
2.50%
6M
6.27%
1Y
19.18%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
11.22%
10Y*
13.18%

GCOW

1D
0.85%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
13.21%
6M
20.65%
1Y
31.30%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VLU vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VLU vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLU
VLU Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLU Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLU Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLU vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLUGCOWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

2.27

-1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

3.01

-1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.44

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.77

-1.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.78

14.12

-6.33

VLU vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLU and GCOW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLUGCOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.27

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

1.02

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.63

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.60

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between VLU and GCOW is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

VLU vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

VLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than GCOW's 4.39% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
1.78%1.82%2.00%2.02%2.16%1.86%1.98%2.19%2.57%1.96%2.14%6.37%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.39%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%0.00%

Drawdowns

VLU vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLU drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, roughly equal to the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLU and GCOW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VLUGCOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.39%

-37.64%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.40%

-11.05%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.55%

-21.48%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.39%

-37.64%

+0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.43%

-1.84%

-2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-5.90%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.17%

+0.43%

Volatility

VLU vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 4.03%. This indicates that VLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VLUGCOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

4.03%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

7.90%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.77%

13.89%

+2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.46%

13.48%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

16.25%

+1.84%