VLU vs. VLUE
VLU (SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF) and VLUE (iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - VLU tracks the S&P 1500 Low Valuation Tilt Index while VLUE tracks the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VLU returned 14.20%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VLUE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VLU charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VLUE.
Performance
VLU vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLU achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly lower than VLUE's 45.30% return. Over the past 10 years, VLU has underperformed VLUE with an annualized return of 14.20%, while VLUE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.
VLU
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 13.07%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 27.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 14.20%
VLUE
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- 45.30%
- 6M
- 44.72%
- 1Y
- 81.73%
- 3Y*
- 32.50%
- 5Y*
- 16.52%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
VLU vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLU SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF | 13.07% | 16.70% | 17.24% | 17.18% | -8.24% | 30.95% | 9.91% | 26.20% | -7.89% | 18.16% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 45.30% | 32.67% | 7.25% | 14.26% | -14.17% | 28.93% | -0.23% | 27.20% | -11.13% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLU and VLUE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.76 |
The correlation between VLU and VLUE shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VLU vs. VLUE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VLU
VLUE
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VLU
VLUE
Financial Services
VLU
VLUE
Healthcare
VLU
VLUE
Consumer Cyclical
VLU
VLUE
Communication Services
VLU
VLUE
Industrials
VLU
VLUE
Consumer Defensive
VLU
VLUE
Energy
VLU
VLUE
Utilities
VLU
VLUE
Real Estate
VLU
VLUE
Basic Materials
VLU
VLUE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLU vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank
VLU
VLUE
VLU vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VLU | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.73 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 9.09 | -4.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.56 | 38.03 | -20.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VLU vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLU drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, smaller than the maximum VLUE drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLU and VLUE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLU | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.39% | -39.47% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.34% | -9.04% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.22% | -17.89% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.55% | -27.12% | +7.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.39% | -39.47% | +2.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -3.46% | +2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -6.00% | +2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 2.16% | -0.57% |
Volatility
VLU vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) is 2.94%, while iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that VLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLU | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 9.76% | -6.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.90% | 16.13% | -8.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.98% | 19.07% | -8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 18.12% | -2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 19.95% | -1.89% |
VLU vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VLU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than VLUE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VLU vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison
VLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than VLUE's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLU SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.00% | 2.02% | 2.16% | 1.86% | 1.98% | 2.19% | 2.57% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 6.37% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 1.42% | 2.11% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.70% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VLU and VLUE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLUE has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to VLU (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLU dropped -37.39% vs VLUE's -39.47%.
On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 15.56% vs 14.20% for VLU. On fees, VLU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VLU has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 14.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VLU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VLUE.
VLU has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.42% for VLUE.
VLU tracks S&P 1500 Low Valuation Tilt Index, while VLUE tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VLU and 0.15% for VLUE.
VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VLU and VLUE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer