VLU vs. SCHD
VLU (SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VLU is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 1500 Low Valuation Tilt Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VLU returned 14.21%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for SCHD. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VLU charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
VLU vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLU achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.24% return. Over the past 10 years, VLU has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 14.21%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.68% annualized return.
VLU
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 13.20%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- 28.80%
- 3Y*
- 20.24%
- 5Y*
- 12.54%
- 10Y*
- 14.21%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 6M
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 24.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
VLU vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLU SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF | 13.20% | 16.70% | 17.24% | 17.18% | -8.24% | 30.95% | 9.91% | 26.20% | -7.89% | 18.16% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.24% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLU and SCHD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012 | 0.69 |
The correlation between VLU and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VLU vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VLU
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
VLU
SCHD
Financial Services
VLU
SCHD
Healthcare
VLU
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
VLU
SCHD
Communication Services
VLU
SCHD
Industrials
VLU
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
VLU
SCHD
Energy
VLU
SCHD
Utilities
VLU
SCHD
Real Estate
VLU
SCHD
-
Basic Materials
VLU
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLU vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
VLU
SCHD
VLU vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VLU | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.39 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.56 | 5.24 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.19 | 12.71 | +5.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VLU vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLU drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLU and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLU | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.39% | -33.37% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.34% | -4.61% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.22% | -16.13% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.55% | -16.85% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.39% | -33.37% | -4.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -2.86% | +1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -3.31% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.90% | -0.31% |
Volatility
VLU vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) is 2.94%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that VLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLU | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 3.58% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.90% | 7.74% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.00% | 11.09% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 14.36% | +1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 16.73% | +1.33% |
VLU vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VLU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VLU vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
VLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than SCHD's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.31% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
VLU SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF | 2.05% | 1.82% | 2.00% | 2.02% | 2.16% | 1.86% | 1.98% | 2.19% | 2.57% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 6.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VLU and SCHD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to VLU (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLU dropped -37.39% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, VLU leads with 14.21% vs 12.68% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VLU has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VLU has performed better with a 14.21% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VLU.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 2.05% for VLU.
VLU is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. VLU tracks S&P 1500 Low Valuation Tilt Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VLU and 0.06% for SCHD.
VLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VLU and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer