VLAAX vs. PALDX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VLAAX (Value Line Asset Allocation Fund) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, VLAAX returned 2.64%/yr vs 9.32%/yr for PALDX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VLAAX charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.

Performance

VLAAX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLAAX achieves a -5.54% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's 7.39% return.

VLAAX

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: -5.54%
• 6M: -6.39%
• 1Y: -11.77%
• 3Y*: 4.21%
• 5Y*: 2.64%
• 10Y*: 7.10%

PALDX

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 2.30%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 7.89%
• 1Y: 20.18%
• 3Y*: 16.92%
• 5Y*: 9.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLAAX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VLAAX Value Line Asset Allocation Fund	-5.54%	-2.61%	9.36%	21.52%	-15.70%	11.77%	15.24%	25.40%	2.00%	4.37%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	7.39%	13.62%	18.96%	18.90%	-15.65%	16.30%	10.68%	22.27%	-4.12%	5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between VLAAX and PALDX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017	0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between VLAAX and PALDX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

VLAAX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLAAX

VLAAX Risk / Return Rank: 0
VLAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
VLAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
VLAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
VLAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
VLAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

PALDX

PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 78
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLAAX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VLAAX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.31	2.59	-3.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.75	3.72	-5.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.49	-0.69
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	3.43	-4.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.49	16.27	-17.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VLAAX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLAAX Sharpe Ratio is -1.31, which is lower than the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLAAX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VLAAX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.31	2.59	-3.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.77	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.80	-0.20

Drawdowns

VLAAX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLAAX drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLAAX and PALDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VLAAX	PALDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.95%	-26.16%	-17.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.38%	-5.96%	-8.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.28%	-16.06%	-4.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.26%	-20.47%	-1.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.41%	-0.46%	-17.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.89%	-4.09%	-2.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.83%	1.25%	+6.58%

Volatility

VLAAX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) at 2.31%. This indicates that VLAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VLAAX	PALDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.80%	2.31%	+0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.68%	6.18%	+0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.93%	7.91%	+1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.64%	12.11%	+1.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.92%	12.69%	+0.23%

VLAAX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLAAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

VLAAX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

VLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.94%, more than PALDX's 5.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	5.05%	5.42%	10.40%	2.94%	6.19%	6.87%	2.58%	4.58%	3.65%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%
VLAAX Value Line Asset Allocation Fund	12.94%	12.22%	10.14%	9.88%	6.00%	6.43%	0.53%	1.74%	3.09%	4.34%	2.38%	2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VLAAX and PALDX in my portfolio?

VLAAX and PALDX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VLAAX or PALDX?

VLAAX has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to PALDX (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLAAX dropped -43.95% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.