VLAAX vs. PGEOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) and George Putnam Balanced Fund (PGEOX).
VLAAX is managed by Value Line. It was launched on Aug 23, 1993. PGEOX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Nov 5, 1937.
Performance
VLAAX vs. PGEOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VLAAX vs. PGEOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLAAX Value Line Asset Allocation Fund | -6.14% | -2.61% | 9.36% | 21.52% | -15.70% | 11.77% | 15.24% | 25.40% | 2.00% | 14.94% |
PGEOX George Putnam Balanced Fund | -2.12% | 14.02% | 20.65% | 19.93% | -17.59% | 13.80% | 9.25% | 22.61% | -3.03% | 15.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLAAX achieves a -6.14% return, which is significantly lower than PGEOX's -2.12% return. Over the past 10 years, VLAAX has underperformed PGEOX with an annualized return of 7.22%, while PGEOX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.24% annualized return.
VLAAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- -6.14%
- 6M
- -9.06%
- 1Y
- -10.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- 2.97%
- 10Y*
- 7.22%
PGEOX
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -3.41%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 6M
- -0.19%
- 1Y
- 14.34%
- 3Y*
- 15.19%
- 5Y*
- 8.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VLAAX vs. PGEOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VLAAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than PGEOX's 0.94% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VLAAX vs. PGEOX — Risk / Return Rank
VLAAX
PGEOX
VLAAX vs. PGEOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) and George Putnam Balanced Fund (PGEOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VLAAX | PGEOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | 1.28 | -2.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | 1.86 | -3.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.28 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 1.90 | -2.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 8.97 | -10.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VLAAX | PGEOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | 1.28 | -2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.71 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.80 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.42 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between VLAAX and PGEOX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VLAAX vs. PGEOX - Dividend Comparison
VLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.02%, more than PGEOX's 7.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLAAX Value Line Asset Allocation Fund | 13.02% | 12.22% | 10.14% | 9.88% | 6.00% | 6.43% | 0.53% | 1.74% | 3.09% | 4.34% | 2.38% | 2.98% |
PGEOX George Putnam Balanced Fund | 7.96% | 8.13% | 7.99% | 1.10% | 0.89% | 7.75% | 1.05% | 5.22% | 9.04% | 1.10% | 1.18% | 1.13% |
Drawdowns
VLAAX vs. PGEOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLAAX drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, smaller than the maximum PGEOX drawdown of -50.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLAAX and PGEOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLAAX | PGEOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.95% | -50.63% | +6.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.52% | -7.97% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.26% | -21.36% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.89% | -23.00% | -0.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.93% | -3.86% | -15.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -11.78% | +4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.03% | 1.69% | +4.34% |
Volatility
VLAAX vs. PGEOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) is 2.91%, while George Putnam Balanced Fund (PGEOX) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that VLAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGEOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VLAAX | PGEOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 3.85% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.44% | 6.41% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.96% | 11.58% | -0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.61% | 11.40% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 11.59% | +1.30% |