VIS vs. VIG
VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIS returned 14.09%/yr vs 13.25%/yr for VIG. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VIS charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
VIS vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIS achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, VIS has outperformed VIG with an annualized return of 14.09%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.25% annualized return.
VIS
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 6M
- 16.70%
- 1Y
- 28.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
VIG
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- 20.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
VIS vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 14.99% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 20.80% | 12.34% | 30.09% | -14.01% | 21.47% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.77% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIS and VIG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006 | 0.89 |
The correlation between VIS and VIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VIS vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIS
VIG
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
VIS
VIG
Technology
VIS
VIG
Utilities
VIS
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
VIS
VIG
Financial Services
VIS
VIG
Energy
VIS
VIG
Basic Materials
VIS
VIG
Communication Services
VIS
VIG
Real Estate
VIS
VIG
-
Healthcare
VIS
VIG
Consumer Defensive
VIS
-
VIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIS vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
VIS
VIG
VIS vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIS | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 2.07 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.51 | 3.01 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.37 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 2.67 | -0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.60 | 10.82 | -1.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIS | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.07 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.76 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.83 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.60 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
VIS vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, which is greater than VIG's maximum drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIS | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.51% | -46.81% | -16.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -7.91% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.80% | -14.95% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.96% | -20.39% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.42% | -31.72% | -10.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | 0.00% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.38% | -5.52% | -2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 1.96% | +0.99% |
Volatility
VIS vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.32%. This indicates that VIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIS | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 2.32% | +2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.55% | 7.64% | +5.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.42% | 10.01% | +6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 14.23% | +4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 16.05% | +4.38% |
VIS vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VIS vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than VIG's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.46% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.89% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIS and VIG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIS has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to VIG (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIS dropped -63.51% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 14.09% vs 13.25% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 14.09% return vs 13.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VIS.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.89% for VIS.
VIS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VIG is Dividend. VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VIS and 0.04% for VIG.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIS and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer