VIS vs. RBLD
VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) and RBLD (First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while RBLD is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIS returned 13.86%/yr vs 8.19%/yr for RBLD. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VIS charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for RBLD.
Performance
VIS vs. RBLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIS achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly lower than RBLD's 16.81% return. Over the past 10 years, VIS has outperformed RBLD with an annualized return of 13.86%, while RBLD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.19% annualized return.
VIS
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- 15.98%
- 1Y
- 21.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.87%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.05%
RBLD
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- YTD
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 20.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $127.03K | $1.03M | $779.49K | |
| $22.93M | $23.95M | $29.49M |
VIS vs. RBLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 15.98% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 20.80% | 12.34% | 30.09% | -14.01% | 21.47% |
RBLD First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF | 16.81% | 13.99% | 17.94% | 19.36% | -9.87% | 12.98% | 0.51% | 12.81% | -21.72% | 22.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIS and RBLD is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2008 | 0.77 |
The correlation between VIS and RBLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.91 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VIS vs. RBLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIS
RBLD
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Industrials
VIS
RBLD
Technology
VIS
RBLD
Consumer Cyclical
VIS
RBLD
-
Energy
VIS
RBLD
Basic Materials
VIS
RBLD
Financial Services
VIS
RBLD
-
Utilities
VIS
RBLD
Real Estate
VIS
RBLD
Healthcare
VIS
RBLD
-
Communication Services
VIS
RBLD
Consumer Defensive
VIS
-
RBLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIS vs. RBLD — Risk / Return Rank
VIS
RBLD
VIS vs. RBLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIS | RBLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 2.61 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.48 | 8.60 | -2.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIS vs. RBLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, which is greater than RBLD's maximum drawdown of -50.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and RBLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIS | RBLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.51% | -50.07% | -13.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -7.19% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.80% | -19.14% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.96% | -22.54% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.42% | -50.07% | +7.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.42% | -4.12% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.33% | -10.76% | +2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 2.18% | +0.91% |
Volatility
VIS vs. RBLD - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) at 3.65%. This indicates that VIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIS | RBLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 3.65% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.66% | 11.00% | +3.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.97% | 14.19% | +3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 16.78% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 18.50% | +1.98% |
VIS vs. RBLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RBLD's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIS vs. RBLD - Dividend Comparison
VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than RBLD's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBLD First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF | 0.97% | 1.19% | 1.31% | 1.16% | 2.10% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.84% | 1.74% | 1.49% | 2.01% | 1.17% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.90% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIS and RBLD have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIS has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to RBLD (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIS dropped -63.51% vs RBLD's -50.07%.
On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 13.86% vs 8.19% for RBLD. On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, RBLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 13.86% return vs 8.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RBLD.
RBLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.90% for VIS.
VIS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while RBLD is Infrastructure Equities. VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while RBLD tracks Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VIS and 0.65% for RBLD.
RBLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIS and RBLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer