PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIS vs. RBLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIS vs. RBLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIS achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly lower than RBLD's 19.89% return. Over the past 10 years, VIS has outperformed RBLD with an annualized return of 14.06%, while RBLD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.40% annualized return.


VIS

1D
-0.31%
1M
2.27%
YTD
14.63%
6M
15.23%
1Y
26.72%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
12.60%
10Y*
14.06%

RBLD

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.95%
YTD
19.89%
6M
18.51%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
10.76%
10Y*
8.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIS vs. RBLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
14.63%18.57%16.85%22.50%-8.57%20.80%12.34%30.09%-14.01%21.47%
RBLD
First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF
19.89%13.99%17.94%19.36%-9.87%12.98%0.51%12.81%-21.72%22.95%

Correlation

The correlation between VIS and RBLD is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2008

0.77

The correlation between VIS and RBLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.91 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VIS vs. RBLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIS
RBLD

Industrials

89.4%
41.6%

Technology

4.5%
9.2%

Utilities

4.3%
28.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Energy

0.1%
9.3%

Basic Materials

0.1%
6.2%

Communication Services

0.0%
1.0%

Real Estate

0.0%
5.0%

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Industrials

VIS
89.4%
RBLD
41.6%

Technology

VIS
4.5%
RBLD
9.2%

Utilities

VIS
4.3%
RBLD
28.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VIS
1.1%
RBLD

-

Financial Services

VIS
0.2%
RBLD

-

Energy

VIS
0.1%
RBLD
9.3%

Basic Materials

VIS
0.1%
RBLD
6.2%

Communication Services

VIS
0.0%
RBLD
1.0%

Real Estate

VIS
0.0%
RBLD
5.0%

Healthcare

VIS
0.0%
RBLD

-

Consumer Defensive

VIS

-

RBLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIS vs. RBLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIS
VIS Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIS Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

RBLD
RBLD Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RBLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RBLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIS vs. RBLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VISRBLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

2.15

-0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.37

2.93

-0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

4.01

-1.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.06

13.80

-4.74

VIS vs. RBLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the RBLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIS and RBLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VISRBLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

2.15

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.64

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.45

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.38

+0.14

Drawdowns

VIS vs. RBLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, which is greater than RBLD's maximum drawdown of -50.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and RBLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VISRBLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.51%

-50.07%

-13.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.29%

-7.19%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.80%

-19.14%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.96%

-23.71%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.42%

-50.07%

+7.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-0.71%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-10.84%

+2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.08%

+0.88%

Volatility

VIS vs. RBLD - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) at 4.27%. This indicates that VIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VISRBLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

4.27%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.47%

10.39%

+3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.42%

13.45%

+2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.35%

16.82%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.43%

18.73%

+1.70%

VIS vs. RBLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RBLD's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIS vs. RBLD - Dividend Comparison

VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than RBLD's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RBLD
First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF
1.01%1.19%1.31%1.16%2.10%1.45%2.88%1.84%1.74%1.49%2.01%1.17%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
0.89%1.01%1.23%1.36%1.52%1.11%1.38%1.68%1.90%1.60%1.81%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIS and RBLD have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIS has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to RBLD (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIS dropped -63.51% vs RBLD's -50.07%.

On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 14.06% vs 8.40% for RBLD. On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, RBLD has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 14.06% return vs 8.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RBLD.

RBLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.89% for VIS.

VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while RBLD tracks Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VIS and 0.65% for RBLD.

RBLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIS and RBLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer