PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIOG vs. SFSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIOG vs. SFSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIOG achieves a 23.15% return, which is significantly higher than SFSNX's 18.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIOG having a 11.07% annualized return and SFSNX not far behind at 10.84%.


VIOG

1D
0.31%
1M
2.62%
6M
17.09%
YTD
23.15%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
11.07%

SFSNX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.49%
6M
12.17%
YTD
18.83%
1Y
27.14%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIOG vs. SFSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
23.15%5.40%9.23%16.92%-21.14%22.49%19.68%21.16%-4.57%14.70%
SFSNX
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund
18.83%7.66%8.99%20.15%-14.79%30.91%8.49%24.44%-12.26%12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between VIOG and SFSNX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.91

The correlation between VIOG and SFSNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIOG vs. SFSNX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIOG
SFSNX

Technology

21.2%
16.2%

Industrials

18.7%
19.3%

Healthcare

14.7%
7.1%

Financial Services

13.4%
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
12.2%

Real Estate

6.5%
9.8%

Energy

3.8%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
3.9%

Basic Materials

3.0%
5.2%

Communication Services

2.9%
4.0%

Utilities

1.7%
2.7%

Technology

VIOG
21.2%
SFSNX
16.2%

Industrials

VIOG
18.7%
SFSNX
19.3%

Healthcare

VIOG
14.7%
SFSNX
7.1%

Financial Services

VIOG
13.4%
SFSNX
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VIOG
10.7%
SFSNX
12.2%

Real Estate

VIOG
6.5%
SFSNX
9.8%

Energy

VIOG
3.8%
SFSNX
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

VIOG
3.4%
SFSNX
3.9%

Basic Materials

VIOG
3.0%
SFSNX
5.2%

Communication Services

VIOG
2.9%
SFSNX
4.0%

Utilities

VIOG
1.7%
SFSNX
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIOG vs. SFSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIOG
VIOG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VIOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SFSNX
SFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIOG vs. SFSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIOGSFSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.91

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.61

9.46

+1.15

VIOG vs. SFSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the SFSNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIOG and SFSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIOG vs. SFSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIOG drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, smaller than the maximum SFSNX drawdown of -58.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOG and SFSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIOGSFSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.73%

-58.32%

+16.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-9.43%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-25.91%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

-25.91%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

-44.82%

+3.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-1.97%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-8.27%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.89%

-0.26%

Volatility

VIOG vs. SFSNX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) have volatilities of 4.43% and 4.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIOGSFSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

4.56%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

12.20%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

17.26%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

20.76%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.82%

23.22%

-0.40%

VIOG vs. SFSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIOG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SFSNX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIOG vs. SFSNX - Dividend Comparison

VIOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than SFSNX's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFSNX
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund
1.15%1.36%1.71%1.37%7.05%12.27%1.42%3.66%11.55%6.88%1.86%6.37%
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
0.76%1.04%1.03%1.15%1.17%0.69%0.68%1.09%0.76%0.87%0.92%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, VIOG and SFSNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SFSNX has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to VIOG (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOG dropped -41.73% vs SFSNX's -58.32%.

SFSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIOG and SFSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer