SFSNX vs. SFLNX
SFSNX (Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund) and SFLNX (Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SFSNX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SFLNX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI US Large Company Index. Over the past 10 years, SFSNX returned 11.45%/yr vs 14.51%/yr for SFLNX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
SFSNX vs. SFLNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFSNX achieves a 17.61% return, which is significantly higher than SFLNX's 14.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SFSNX has underperformed SFLNX with an annualized return of 11.45%, while SFLNX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.51% annualized return.
SFSNX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 17.61%
- 6M
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 32.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
SFLNX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 14.75%
- 6M
- 14.18%
- 1Y
- 30.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 14.51%
SFSNX vs. SFLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFSNX Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund | 17.61% | 7.66% | 8.99% | 20.15% | -14.79% | 30.91% | 8.49% | 24.44% | -12.26% | 12.84% |
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund | 14.75% | 17.02% | 16.78% | 18.16% | -6.89% | 31.64% | 9.12% | 28.91% | -7.43% | 17.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFSNX and SFLNX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SFSNX and SFLNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
SFSNX vs. SFLNX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFSNX
SFLNX
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
SFSNX
SFLNX
Technology
SFSNX
SFLNX
Financial Services
SFSNX
SFLNX
Consumer Cyclical
SFSNX
SFLNX
Real Estate
SFSNX
SFLNX
Healthcare
SFSNX
SFLNX
Energy
SFSNX
SFLNX
Basic Materials
SFSNX
SFLNX
Communication Services
SFSNX
SFLNX
Consumer Defensive
SFSNX
SFLNX
Utilities
SFSNX
SFLNX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFSNX vs. SFLNX — Risk / Return Rank
SFSNX
SFLNX
SFSNX vs. SFLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFSNX | SFLNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.55 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 5.23 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.79 | 20.28 | -8.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFSNX vs. SFLNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFSNX drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, roughly equal to the maximum SFLNX drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFSNX and SFLNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFSNX | SFLNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.32% | -56.18% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -6.10% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.91% | -16.27% | -9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.91% | -18.98% | -6.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.82% | -37.59% | -7.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -1.02% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -6.00% | -2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 1.57% | +1.32% |
Volatility
SFSNX vs. SFLNX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) at 3.37%. This indicates that SFSNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFSNX | SFLNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 3.37% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.28% | 7.79% | +4.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.44% | 10.64% | +6.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 15.26% | +5.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.30% | 18.42% | +4.88% |
SFSNX vs. SFLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SFSNX and SFLNX have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SFSNX vs. SFLNX - Dividend Comparison
SFSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than SFLNX's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.78% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 4.78% | 6.17% | 5.33% | 9.69% | 3.28% | 7.23% | 5.68% |
SFSNX Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund | 1.16% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 1.37% | 7.05% | 12.27% | 1.42% | 3.66% | 11.55% | 6.88% | 1.86% | 6.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFSNX and SFLNX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFSNX has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to SFLNX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFSNX dropped -58.32% vs SFLNX's -56.18%.
SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFSNX and SFLNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer