PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIOG vs. RZG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIOG vs. RZG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIOG achieves a 21.22% return, which is significantly lower than RZG's 27.46% return. Over the past 10 years, VIOG has outperformed RZG with an annualized return of 11.67%, while RZG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.90% annualized return.


VIOG

1D
-0.43%
1M
5.48%
YTD
21.22%
6M
17.74%
1Y
31.94%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
11.67%

RZG

1D
-0.21%
1M
8.64%
YTD
27.46%
6M
23.58%
1Y
40.75%
3Y*
20.36%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
10.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIOG vs. RZG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
21.22%5.40%9.23%16.92%-21.14%22.49%19.68%21.16%-4.57%14.70%
RZG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF
27.46%10.22%9.84%19.15%-29.00%21.01%17.76%14.25%-8.70%19.18%

Correlation

The correlation between VIOG and RZG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.93

The correlation between VIOG and RZG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIOG vs. RZG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIOG
RZG

Technology

19.7%
18.4%

Industrials

19.5%
16.8%

Healthcare

14.6%
22.7%

Financial Services

13.7%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
9.1%

Real Estate

6.6%
5.5%

Energy

4.1%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
5.4%

Basic Materials

3.1%
0.4%

Communication Services

2.7%
3.5%

Utilities

1.7%
0.4%

Technology

VIOG
19.7%
RZG
18.4%

Industrials

VIOG
19.5%
RZG
16.8%

Healthcare

VIOG
14.6%
RZG
22.7%

Financial Services

VIOG
13.7%
RZG
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VIOG
10.9%
RZG
9.1%

Real Estate

VIOG
6.6%
RZG
5.5%

Energy

VIOG
4.1%
RZG
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

VIOG
3.3%
RZG
5.4%

Basic Materials

VIOG
3.1%
RZG
0.4%

Communication Services

VIOG
2.7%
RZG
3.5%

Utilities

VIOG
1.7%
RZG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIOG vs. RZG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIOG
VIOG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VIOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

RZG
RZG Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
RZG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
RZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
RZG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIOG vs. RZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIOGRZGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

4.75

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

16.04

-3.79

VIOG vs. RZG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the RZG Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIOG and RZG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIOG vs. RZG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIOG drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, smaller than the maximum RZG drawdown of -58.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOG and RZG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIOGRZGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.73%

-58.52%

+16.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-8.63%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-25.73%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

-38.33%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

-54.02%

+12.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.21%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.60%

-12.09%

+4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.55%

+0.07%

Volatility

VIOG vs. RZG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) have volatilities of 5.47% and 5.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIOGRZGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

5.43%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

14.15%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.92%

18.98%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.53%

23.04%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.86%

24.65%

-1.79%

VIOG vs. RZG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIOG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RZG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIOG vs. RZG - Dividend Comparison

VIOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than RZG's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RZG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF
0.44%0.37%0.95%1.43%1.59%0.22%0.49%0.70%0.46%0.44%0.65%0.70%
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
0.80%1.04%1.03%1.15%1.17%0.69%0.68%1.09%0.76%0.87%0.92%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, VIOG and RZG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VIOG has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to RZG (5.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOG dropped -41.73% vs RZG's -58.52%.

On 10-year performance, VIOG leads with 11.67% vs 10.90% for RZG. On fees, VIOG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIOG has performed better with a 11.67% return vs 10.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIOG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RZG.

VIOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.44% for RZG.

VIOG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while RZG tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Growth. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VIOG and 0.35% for RZG.

RZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIOG and RZG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer