RZG vs. FDG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG).
RZG and FDG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RZG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Growth. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. FDG is an actively managed fund by American Century Investments. It was launched on Mar 31, 2020.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RZG or FDG.
Key characteristics
| RZG | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 20.05% | 44.50% |
| 1Y Return | 38.95% | 60.61% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.25% | 5.40% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.95 | 3.12 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.85 | 3.85 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.33 | 1.55 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.27 | 2.17 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.85 | 17.96 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.33% | 3.40% |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.28% | 19.55% |
| Max Drawdown | -58.52% | -43.69% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.43% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between RZG and FDG is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RZG vs. FDG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RZG achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly lower than FDG's 44.50% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RZG vs. FDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RZG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FDG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RZG vs. FDG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RZG vs. FDG - Dividend Comparison
RZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, while FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF | 0.95% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 0.22% | 0.48% | 0.70% | 0.46% | 0.44% | 0.65% | 0.70% | 0.36% | 0.34% |
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RZG vs. FDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RZG drawdown since its inception was -58.52%, which is greater than FDG's maximum drawdown of -43.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZG and FDG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RZG vs. FDG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) at 6.38%. This indicates that RZG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.