RZG vs. FDG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RZG (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF) and FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RZG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Growth, while FDG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by American Century. RZG is passively managed, while FDG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RZG returned 5.01%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for FDG. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RZG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDG.

Performance

RZG vs. FDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RZG achieves a 18.31% return, which is significantly higher than FDG's 9.71% return.

RZG

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -0.59%
• YTD: 18.31%
• 6M: 18.84%
• 1Y: 32.35%
• 3Y*: 17.17%
• 5Y*: 5.01%
• 10Y*: 9.67%

FDG

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: 6.55%
• YTD: 9.71%
• 6M: 12.54%
• 1Y: 34.58%
• 3Y*: 30.14%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RZG vs. FDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF	18.31%	10.22%	9.84%	19.15%	-29.00%	21.01%	96.07%
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	9.71%	22.13%	45.89%	37.22%	-35.74%	8.52%	93.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RZG and FDG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020	0.69

The correlation between RZG and FDG shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RZG vs. FDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RZG	FDG
Healthcare	22.0%	13.2%
Industrials	18.2%	5.2%
Technology	16.8%	37.7%
Financial Services	15.0%	4.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.8%	17.1%
Real Estate	7.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	-
Energy	3.0%	0.6%
Communication Services	1.9%	21.5%
Basic Materials	0.4%	-
Utilities	0.4%	0.1%

Return for Risk

RZG vs. FDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RZG

RZG Risk / Return Rank: 58
RZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
RZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
RZG Omega Ratio Rank: 47
RZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RZG Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FDG

FDG Risk / Return Rank: 52
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RZG vs. FDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RZG	FDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.97	-0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	2.62	-0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.34	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	2.30	+1.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.60	8.14	+4.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RZG vs. FDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RZG Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the FDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RZG and FDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RZG	FDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75	1.97	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.55	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.94	-0.56

Drawdowns

RZG vs. FDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RZG drawdown since its inception was -58.52%, which is greater than FDG's maximum drawdown of -43.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZG and FDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RZG	FDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.52%	-43.69%	-14.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.63%	-15.71%	+7.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.73%	-26.14%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.33%	-43.69%	+5.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.78%	-1.16%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.13%	-13.44%	+1.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	4.44%	-1.87%

Volatility

RZG vs. FDG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) have volatilities of 4.72% and 4.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RZG	FDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.72%	4.66%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.64%	13.88%	-0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.57%	17.68%	+0.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.98%	24.67%	-1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.65%	24.89%	-0.24%

RZG vs. FDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RZG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FDG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

RZG vs. FDG - Dividend Comparison

RZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF	0.42%	0.37%	0.95%	1.43%	1.59%	0.22%	0.49%	0.70%	0.46%	0.44%	0.65%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RZG and FDG in my portfolio?

RZG and FDG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RZG or FDG?

RZG has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to FDG (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RZG dropped -58.52% vs FDG's -43.69%.

Which ETF is better, RZG or FDG?

On 5-year performance, FDG leads with 13.50% vs 5.01% for RZG. On fees, RZG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RZG or FDG?

Over the 5-year period, FDG has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 5.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RZG or FDG?

RZG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RZG or FDG?

RZG has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.

What is the main difference between RZG and FDG?

RZG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while FDG is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RZG and 0.45% for FDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.