PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIOG vs. FSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIOG vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VIOG having a 15.37% return and FSMD slightly lower at 14.85%.


VIOG

1D
-0.65%
1M
0.86%
YTD
15.37%
6M
13.49%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
14.40%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
10.83%

FSMD

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.46%
YTD
14.85%
6M
14.81%
1Y
25.71%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIOG vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
15.37%5.40%9.23%16.92%-21.14%22.49%19.68%6.03%
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
14.85%8.70%15.18%17.37%-11.15%26.40%8.94%8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VIOG and FSMD is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.95

The correlation between VIOG and FSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIOG vs. FSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIOG
FSMD

Technology

19.7%
18.2%

Industrials

19.5%
20.7%

Healthcare

14.6%
11.6%

Financial Services

13.7%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
11.1%

Real Estate

6.6%
6.2%

Energy

4.1%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
3.3%

Basic Materials

3.1%
3.9%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.8%

Utilities

1.7%
2.2%

Technology

VIOG
19.7%
FSMD
18.2%

Industrials

VIOG
19.5%
FSMD
20.7%

Healthcare

VIOG
14.6%
FSMD
11.6%

Financial Services

VIOG
13.7%
FSMD
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VIOG
10.9%
FSMD
11.1%

Real Estate

VIOG
6.6%
FSMD
6.2%

Energy

VIOG
4.1%
FSMD
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

VIOG
3.3%
FSMD
3.3%

Basic Materials

VIOG
3.1%
FSMD
3.9%

Communication Services

VIOG
2.7%
FSMD
2.8%

Utilities

VIOG
1.7%
FSMD
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIOG vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIOG
VIOG Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VIOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIOG vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIOGFSMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.06

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

11.03

-1.02

VIOG vs. FSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the FSMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIOG and FSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIOGFSMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.69

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.53

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.55

+0.04

Drawdowns

VIOG vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIOG drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, roughly equal to the maximum FSMD drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOG and FSMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIOGFSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.73%

-40.67%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-8.44%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-22.16%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

-22.16%

-6.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-0.08%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.62%

-6.00%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.34%

+0.30%

Volatility

VIOG vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) have volatilities of 4.61% and 4.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIOGFSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

4.45%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

11.37%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.48%

15.26%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.47%

18.48%

+2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.84%

21.42%

+1.42%

VIOG vs. FSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIOG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FSMD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIOG vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison

VIOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than FSMD's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.21%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
0.84%1.04%1.03%1.15%1.17%0.69%0.68%1.09%0.76%0.87%0.92%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, VIOG and FSMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VIOG has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to FSMD (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOG dropped -41.73% vs FSMD's -40.67%.

On 5-year performance, FSMD leads with 9.66% vs 5.47% for VIOG. On fees, VIOG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FSMD has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 9.66% return vs 5.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIOG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FSMD.

FSMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.84% for VIOG.

VIOG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VIOG and 0.29% for FSMD.

FSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIOG and FSMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer