FSMD vs. BFGFX
FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) and BFGFX (Baron Focused Growth Fund) are both funds - FSMD is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while BFGFX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital. FSMD is passively managed, while BFGFX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSMD returned 9.94%/yr vs 10.85%/yr for BFGFX. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FSMD charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for BFGFX.
Performance
FSMD vs. BFGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 15.80% return, which is significantly higher than BFGFX's -0.09% return.
FSMD
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- YTD
- 15.80%
- 1Y
- 24.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.65%
BFGFX
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- 6M
- 3.60%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- 16.60%
- 3Y*
- 16.67%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- 20.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $4.61M | $5.11M | $5.82M |
FSMD vs. BFGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 15.80% | 8.70% | 15.18% | 17.37% | -11.15% | 26.40% | 8.94% | 8.81% |
BFGFX Baron Focused Growth Fund | -0.09% | 21.94% | 29.52% | 27.40% | -28.21% | 18.67% | 122.38% | 16.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMD and BFGFX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSMD and BFGFX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSMD vs. BFGFX — Risk / Return Rank
FSMD
BFGFX
FSMD vs. BFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSMD | BFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.14 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 0.85 | +1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.08 | 2.78 | +6.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSMD vs. BFGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, smaller than the maximum BFGFX drawdown of -59.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and BFGFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMD | BFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.67% | -59.52% | +18.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -16.49% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.16% | -21.00% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.16% | -35.93% | +13.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.99% | -13.67% | +9.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -12.32% | +6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 5.05% | -2.53% |
Volatility
FSMD vs. BFGFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) is 4.05%, while Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that FSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSMD | BFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 7.16% | -3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.33% | 17.27% | -4.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.87% | 23.12% | -7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 22.99% | -4.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.32% | 24.28% | -2.96% |
FSMD vs. BFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BFGFX's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSMD vs. BFGFX - Dividend Comparison
FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while BFGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFGFX Baron Focused Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.28% | 15.53% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.07% | 2.11% | 6.02% | 5.80% |
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 1.25% | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.18% | 1.32% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSMD and BFGFX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BFGFX has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to FSMD (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs BFGFX's -59.52%.
FSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSMD and BFGFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer