VIG vs. XME
VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) and XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIG returned 12.79%/yr vs 15.15%/yr for XME. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VIG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XME.
Performance
VIG vs. XME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly higher than XME's -5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, VIG has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 12.79%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 15.15% annualized return.
VIG
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- 16.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.17%
XME
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -16.42%
- 6M
- -21.16%
- YTD
- -5.54%
- 1Y
- 30.48%
- 3Y*
- 24.42%
- 5Y*
- 19.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.15%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.32%
VIG vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 8.24% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | -5.54% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 21.51% | 13.13% | 34.92% | 15.95% | 14.69% | -26.78% | 21.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIG and XME is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.58 |
The correlation between VIG and XME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
VIG vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIG
XME
Technology
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
VIG
XME
Financial Services
VIG
XME
-
Healthcare
VIG
XME
-
Industrials
VIG
XME
Consumer Defensive
VIG
XME
Consumer Cyclical
VIG
XME
-
Basic Materials
VIG
XME
Utilities
VIG
XME
-
Energy
VIG
XME
Communication Services
VIG
XME
-
Real Estate
VIG
-
XME
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIG vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank
VIG
XME
VIG vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIG | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.16 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 1.16 | +0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.39 | 2.79 | +5.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIG vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and XME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIG | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.81% | -85.89% | +39.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | -26.37% | +18.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -30.47% | +15.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -37.27% | +16.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.72% | -61.69% | +29.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -26.37% | +25.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.48% | -43.97% | +38.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 10.94% | -8.99% |
Volatility
VIG vs. XME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.08%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIG | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.08% | 8.26% | -6.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.67% | 28.01% | -20.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.03% | 36.42% | -26.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 32.67% | -18.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 32.86% | -16.84% |
VIG vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIG vs. XME - Dividend Comparison
VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than XME's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIG and XME have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XME has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to VIG (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs XME's -85.89%.
On 10-year performance, XME leads with 15.15% vs 12.79% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 15.15% return vs 12.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XME.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.38% for XME.
VIG is categorized as Dividend, while XME is Materials. VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.35% for XME.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIG and XME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer