PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIG vs. XME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIG vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly higher than XME's -5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, VIG has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 12.79%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 15.15% annualized return.


VIG

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.75%
6M
5.43%
YTD
8.24%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
12.79%
ALL TIME*
10.17%

XME

1D
-0.62%
1M
-16.42%
6M
-21.16%
YTD
-5.54%
1Y
30.48%
3Y*
24.42%
5Y*
19.38%
10Y*
15.15%
ALL TIME*
5.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIG vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
8.24%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
-5.54%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%

Correlation

The correlation between VIG and XME is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.58

The correlation between VIG and XME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIG vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIG
XME

Technology

26.9%
2.2%

Financial Services

20.3%

-

Healthcare

17.8%

-

Industrials

11.9%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%

-

Basic Materials

3.4%
74.8%

Utilities

3.0%

-

Energy

3.0%
24.0%

Communication Services

0.5%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

VIG
26.9%
XME
2.2%

Financial Services

VIG
20.3%
XME

-

Healthcare

VIG
17.8%
XME

-

Industrials

VIG
11.9%
XME
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

VIG
9.2%
XME
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VIG
4.5%
XME

-

Basic Materials

VIG
3.4%
XME
74.8%

Utilities

VIG
3.0%
XME

-

Energy

VIG
3.0%
XME
24.0%

Communication Services

VIG
0.5%
XME

-

Real Estate

VIG

-

XME

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIG vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIG vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIGXMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.16

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

1.16

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.39

2.79

+5.60

VIG vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the XME Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIG and XME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIG vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and XME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIGXMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.81%

-85.89%

+39.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-26.37%

+18.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-30.47%

+15.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-37.27%

+16.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

-61.69%

+29.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-26.37%

+25.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.48%

-43.97%

+38.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

10.94%

-8.99%

Volatility

VIG vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.08%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIGXMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

8.26%

-6.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.67%

28.01%

-20.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.03%

36.42%

-26.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.19%

32.67%

-18.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

32.86%

-16.84%

VIG vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIG vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than XME's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.52%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.38%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIG and XME have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to VIG (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs XME's -85.89%.

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 15.15% vs 12.79% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 15.15% return vs 12.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XME.

VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.38% for XME.

VIG is categorized as Dividend, while XME is Materials. VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.35% for XME.

VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIG and XME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer