PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIG vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIG vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return. Over the past 10 years, VIG has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 13.23%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.78% annualized return.


VIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.79%
YTD
7.57%
6M
6.99%
1Y
19.63%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
13.23%

VGT

1D
-1.48%
1M
18.07%
YTD
31.64%
6M
30.51%
1Y
60.15%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
25.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIG vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
7.57%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
31.64%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VIG and VGT is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006

0.78

The correlation between VIG and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VIG vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIG
VGT

Technology

26.2%
98.5%

Financial Services

20.6%
0.5%

Healthcare

16.5%
0.0%

Industrials

11.8%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
0.1%

Energy

3.5%
0.3%

Basic Materials

3.5%
0.0%

Utilities

3.2%

-

Communication Services

0.5%
0.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

VIG
26.2%
VGT
98.5%

Financial Services

VIG
20.6%
VGT
0.5%

Healthcare

VIG
16.5%
VGT
0.0%

Industrials

VIG
11.8%
VGT
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

VIG
10.1%
VGT

-

Consumer Cyclical

VIG
4.7%
VGT
0.1%

Energy

VIG
3.5%
VGT
0.3%

Basic Materials

VIG
3.5%
VGT
0.0%

Utilities

VIG
3.2%
VGT

-

Communication Services

VIG
0.5%
VGT
0.5%

Real Estate

VIG

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIG vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIG vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIGVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.47

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.69

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

11.77

-1.71

VIG vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIG and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIGVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.95

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.89

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

1.05

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.68

-0.08

Drawdowns

VIG vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIGVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.81%

-54.63%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-16.40%

+8.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-27.23%

+12.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-35.07%

+14.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

-35.07%

+3.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-1.48%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-7.95%

+2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

5.13%

-3.17%

Volatility

VIG vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.19%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIGVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

6.39%

-4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

16.07%

-8.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.01%

20.57%

-10.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.23%

25.18%

-10.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

24.60%

-8.55%

VIG vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIG vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.47%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIG and VGT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to VIG (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.78% vs 13.23% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 13.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.

VIG is categorized as Dividend, while VGT is Technology Equities. VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIG and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer