VIG vs. FCPGX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) and FCPGX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund) are both funds - VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while FCPGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, VIG returned 13.24%/yr vs 14.97%/yr for FCPGX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VIG charges 0.04%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FCPGX.

Performance

VIG vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's 18.99% return. Over the past 10 years, VIG has underperformed FCPGX with an annualized return of 13.24%, while FCPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.97% annualized return.

VIG

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 3.08%
• YTD: 7.68%
• 6M: 6.99%
• 1Y: 18.23%
• 3Y*: 15.98%
• 5Y*: 10.74%
• 10Y*: 13.24%

FCPGX

• 1D: 4.26%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 18.99%
• 6M: 16.17%
• 1Y: 36.82%
• 3Y*: 20.10%
• 5Y*: 7.60%
• 10Y*: 14.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIG vs. FCPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF	7.68%	14.17%	16.99%	14.51%	-9.80%	23.76%	15.43%	29.62%	-2.08%	22.22%
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund	18.99%	11.20%	20.56%	19.02%	-25.34%	10.50%	36.41%	36.31%	-4.57%	28.99%

Correlation

The correlation between VIG and FCPGX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2006	0.80

The correlation between VIG and FCPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VIG vs. FCPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIG

VIG Risk / Return Rank: 60
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 60

FCPGX

FCPGX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FCPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FCPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FCPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FCPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FCPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIG vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VIG	FCPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.66	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	2.29	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.28	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	2.80	-0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.34	11.15	-1.81

VIG vs. FCPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the FCPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIG and FCPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VIG vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, smaller than the maximum FCPGX drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and FCPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VIG	FCPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.81%	-59.11%	+12.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.91%	-13.12%	+5.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.95%	-28.69%	+13.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.39%	-39.04%	+18.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.72%	-39.04%	+7.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-0.19%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.51%	-10.69%	+5.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	3.29%	-1.33%

Volatility

VIG vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.93%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VIG	FCPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.93%	8.73%	-5.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.78%	17.37%	-9.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.19%	22.11%	-11.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.25%	23.65%	-9.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.06%	22.92%	-6.86%

VIG vs. FCPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

VIG vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison

VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than FCPGX's 5.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund	5.37%	6.38%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%	19.27%	8.19%	5.31%	14.35%	6.88%	1.53%	4.32%
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF	1.47%	1.62%	1.73%	1.88%	1.96%	1.55%	1.63%	1.71%	2.08%	1.88%	2.14%	2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VIG and FCPGX in my portfolio?

VIG and FCPGX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VIG or FCPGX?

FCPGX has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to VIG (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs FCPGX's -59.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.