VGT vs. XSVM
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while XSVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 25.19%/yr vs 13.23%/yr for XSVM. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for XSVM.
Performance
VGT vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.03% return, which is significantly higher than XSVM's 21.88% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed XSVM with an annualized return of 25.19%, while XSVM has yielded a comparatively lower 13.23% annualized return.
VGT
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 24.13%
- 1Y
- 50.48%
- 3Y*
- 29.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.35%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
XSVM
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 21.88%
- 6M
- 18.48%
- 1Y
- 42.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
VGT vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.03% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 21.88% | 7.47% | 2.30% | 20.20% | -13.63% | 56.36% | 5.08% | 30.01% | -12.33% | 3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and XSVM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VGT and XSVM has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VGT vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGT
XSVM
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
VGT
XSVM
Communication Services
VGT
XSVM
Financial Services
VGT
XSVM
Industrials
VGT
XSVM
Energy
VGT
XSVM
Consumer Cyclical
VGT
XSVM
Basic Materials
VGT
XSVM
Healthcare
VGT
XSVM
Consumer Defensive
VGT
-
XSVM
Real Estate
VGT
-
XSVM
Utilities
VGT
-
XSVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
XSVM
VGT vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGT | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.37 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 3.86 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | 11.98 | -2.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGT vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and XSVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -62.57% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -10.08% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -26.21% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | -26.21% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -49.02% | +13.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.18% | 0.00% | -7.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -11.55% | +3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.28% | 3.26% | +2.02% |
Volatility
VGT vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) at 5.09%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.00% | 5.09% | +4.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.00% | 12.03% | +5.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.00% | 18.60% | +3.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 22.61% | +2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 25.08% | -0.36% |
VGT vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGT vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than XSVM's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.74% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGT and XSVM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to XSVM (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs XSVM's -62.57%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.19% vs 13.23% for XSVM. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, XSVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 13.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for XSVM.
XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while XSVM is Momentum. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.37% for XSVM.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and XSVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer