PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGT vs. VIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGT vs. VIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 20.36% return, which is significantly higher than VIS's 15.98% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed VIS with an annualized return of 24.06%, while VIS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.86% annualized return.


VGT

1D
-0.38%
1M
-3.47%
6M
21.30%
YTD
20.36%
1Y
31.68%
3Y*
26.48%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
24.06%
ALL TIME*
14.84%

VIS

1D
0.72%
1M
-3.24%
6M
8.07%
YTD
15.98%
1Y
19.96%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
13.25%
10Y*
13.86%
ALL TIME*
11.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$440.89M$515.41M$573.34M
$22.93M$23.95M$29.49M

VGT vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
20.36%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
15.98%18.57%16.85%22.50%-8.57%20.80%12.34%30.09%-14.01%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and VIS is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004

0.73

The correlation between VGT and VIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VGT vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGT
VIS

Technology

98.6%
5.5%

Communication Services

0.5%
0.0%

Financial Services

0.5%
0.2%

Industrials

0.4%
93.2%

Energy

0.3%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
0.9%

Basic Materials

0.0%
0.2%

Healthcare

0.0%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

0.1%

Technology

VGT
98.6%
VIS
5.5%

Communication Services

VGT
0.5%
VIS
0.0%

Financial Services

VGT
0.5%
VIS
0.2%

Industrials

VGT
0.4%
VIS
93.2%

Energy

VGT
0.3%
VIS
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VGT
0.1%
VIS
0.9%

Basic Materials

VGT
0.0%
VIS
0.2%

Healthcare

VGT
0.0%
VIS
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

VGT

-

VIS

-

Real Estate

VGT

-

VIS
0.0%

Utilities

VGT

-

VIS
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGT vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

VIS
VIS Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VGT vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGTVISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.20

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.63

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.23

6.48

-1.25

VGT vs. VIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the VIS Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and VIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGT vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and VIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGTVISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-63.51%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

-12.29%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

-20.80%

-6.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

-22.96%

-12.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

-42.42%

+7.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.93%

-4.42%

-5.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-8.33%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.07%

3.09%

+2.98%

Volatility

VGT vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) at 5.07%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGTVISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.42%

5.07%

+3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.14%

14.66%

+5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.28%

17.97%

+6.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.83%

18.55%

+7.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.89%

20.48%

+4.41%

VGT vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VGT and VIS have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGT vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than VIS's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.38%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
0.90%1.01%1.23%1.36%1.52%1.11%1.38%1.68%1.90%1.60%1.81%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGT and VIS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to VIS (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs VIS's -63.51%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 24.06% vs 13.86% for VIS. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, VIS has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 24.06% return vs 13.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT and VIS have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

VIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.38% for VGT.

VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while VIS is Industrials Equities. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGT and VIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer