PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGT vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGT vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 22.48% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 24.81%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return.


VGT

1D
-6.14%
1M
5.22%
YTD
22.48%
6M
20.33%
1Y
49.26%
3Y*
30.47%
5Y*
20.48%
10Y*
24.81%

VEA

1D
-3.72%
1M
-2.40%
YTD
10.91%
6M
13.57%
1Y
27.20%
3Y*
18.26%
5Y*
8.83%
10Y*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGT vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
22.48%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
10.91%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and VEA is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.71

The correlation between VGT and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

VGT vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGT
VEA

Technology

98.5%
13.8%

Communication Services

0.5%
3.4%

Financial Services

0.5%
23.3%

Industrials

0.4%
19.2%

Energy

0.3%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
7.5%

Basic Materials

0.0%
7.5%

Healthcare

0.0%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.6%

Real Estate

-

2.7%

Utilities

-

3.3%

Technology

VGT
98.5%
VEA
13.8%

Communication Services

VGT
0.5%
VEA
3.4%

Financial Services

VGT
0.5%
VEA
23.3%

Industrials

VGT
0.4%
VEA
19.2%

Energy

VGT
0.3%
VEA
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VGT
0.1%
VEA
7.5%

Basic Materials

VGT
0.0%
VEA
7.5%

Healthcare

VGT
0.0%
VEA
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

VGT

-

VEA
5.6%

Real Estate

VGT

-

VEA
2.7%

Utilities

VGT

-

VEA
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGT vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGT vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGTVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.31

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.35

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.59

9.12

+0.46

VGT vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGTVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.70

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.53

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

0.56

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.24

+0.43

Drawdowns

VGT vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGTVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-60.68%

+6.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

-11.63%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

-13.45%

-13.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

-29.71%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

-35.73%

+0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.34%

-4.36%

-3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-13.29%

+5.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

2.99%

+2.16%

Volatility

VGT vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 6.17%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGTVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.29%

6.17%

+3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.37%

13.88%

+3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.51%

16.09%

+5.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.31%

16.62%

+8.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.68%

17.39%

+7.29%

VGT vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGT vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VEA's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.71%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGT and VEA have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to VEA (6.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 24.81% vs 9.63% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 24.81% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.03% for VEA.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGT and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer