VGT vs. NLR

Last updated Jul 26, 2026

VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 24.14%/yr vs 10.96%/yr for NLR. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.

Performance

VGT vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 20.52% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -12.96% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed NLR with an annualized return of 24.14%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.96% annualized return.

VGT

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -1.88%
• 6M: 20.32%
• YTD: 20.52%
• 1Y: 32.19%
• 3Y*: 26.68%
• 5Y*: 17.70%
• 10Y*: 24.14%
• ALL TIME*: 14.86%

NLR

• 1D: -2.97%
• 1M: -7.91%
• 6M: -29.25%
• YTD: -12.96%
• 1Y: -8.40%
• 3Y*: 23.96%
• 5Y*: 18.37%
• 10Y*: 10.96%
• ALL TIME*: 3.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	$52.35M	$49.22M	$61.68M
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	$496.23M	$516.61M	$562.67M

VGT vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	20.52%	21.77%	29.30%	52.66%	-29.70%	30.45%	46.04%	48.62%	2.46%	37.08%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	-12.96%	56.50%	14.26%	36.67%	2.29%	13.63%	3.49%	0.20%	4.94%	8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and NLR is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2007	0.53

The correlation between VGT and NLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (10 years) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VGT vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VGT	NLR
Technology	98.6%	1.6%
Communication Services	0.5%	-
Financial Services	0.5%	-
Industrials	0.4%	17.1%
Energy	0.3%	50.0%
Consumer Cyclical	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	2.3%
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	31.5%

Return for Risk

VGT vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 55
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 48

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 10
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 11
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGT vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VGT	NLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	-0.19	+1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	0.03	+1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.00	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.99	-0.22	+2.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.55	-0.48	+6.04

VGT vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VGT vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and NLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	VGT	NLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.63%	-65.05%	+10.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.40%	-36.61%	+20.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.23%	-36.61%	+9.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.07%	-36.61%	+1.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.07%	-36.61%	+1.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.81%	-34.23%	+24.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.95%	-35.67%	+27.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.87%	16.73%	-10.86%

Volatility

VGT vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is 7.50%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that VGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VGT	NLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.50%	10.60%	-3.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.46%	32.75%	-13.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.59%	43.30%	-19.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.70%	29.96%	-4.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.82%	24.47%	+0.35%

VGT vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

VGT vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than NLR's 2.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.93%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.38%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VGT and NLR in my portfolio?

VGT and NLR have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VGT or NLR?

NLR has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to VGT (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs NLR's -65.05%.

Which ETF is better, VGT or NLR?

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 24.14% vs 10.96% for NLR. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 7.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VGT or NLR?

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 24.14% return vs 10.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VGT or NLR?

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VGT or NLR?

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.38% for VGT.

What is the main difference between VGT and NLR?

VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while NLR is Uranium. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.56% for NLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.