VGT vs. NLR
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 25.19%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for NLR. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.
Performance
VGT vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.03% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed NLR with an annualized return of 25.19%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively lower 12.80% annualized return.
VGT
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 24.13%
- 1Y
- 47.99%
- 3Y*
- 29.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.35%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
NLR
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -10.59%
- YTD
- -1.81%
- 6M
- -3.70%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- 29.88%
- 5Y*
- 19.78%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
VGT vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.03% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -1.81% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 4.94% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and NLR is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2007 | 0.53 |
The correlation between VGT and NLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (10 years) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VGT vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGT
NLR
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
VGT
NLR
Communication Services
VGT
NLR
-
Financial Services
VGT
NLR
-
Industrials
VGT
NLR
Energy
VGT
NLR
Consumer Cyclical
VGT
NLR
-
Basic Materials
VGT
NLR
-
Healthcare
VGT
NLR
-
Consumer Defensive
VGT
-
NLR
-
Real Estate
VGT
-
NLR
-
Utilities
VGT
-
NLR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
NLR
VGT vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.10 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 0.63 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | 1.41 | +7.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGT vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -65.05% | +10.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -29.72% | +13.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -30.48% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | -30.48% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -34.35% | -0.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.18% | -25.81% | +18.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -35.70% | +27.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.28% | 13.33% | -8.05% |
Volatility
VGT vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is 10.00%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that VGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.00% | 13.73% | -3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.00% | 33.75% | -15.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.00% | 42.85% | -20.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 29.56% | -4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 24.22% | +0.50% |
VGT vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGT vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than NLR's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.60% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGT and NLR have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NLR has higher volatility (13.73%) compared to VGT (10.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs NLR's -65.05%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.19% vs 12.80% for NLR. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 10.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.
NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.56% for NLR.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer