PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGT vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGT vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 28.27% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 14.11% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 25.72%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.36% annualized return.


VGT

1D
3.42%
1M
6.55%
YTD
28.27%
6M
29.82%
1Y
55.62%
3Y*
30.76%
5Y*
21.17%
10Y*
25.72%

HDV

1D
-1.03%
1M
1.04%
YTD
14.11%
6M
13.57%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
14.34%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
9.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGT vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
28.27%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
14.11%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and HDV is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011

0.50

The correlation between VGT and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VGT vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGT
HDV

Technology

98.5%
9.7%

Communication Services

0.5%
0.1%

Financial Services

0.5%
10.8%

Industrials

0.4%
1.3%

Energy

0.3%
21.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
6.0%

Basic Materials

0.0%
1.1%

Healthcare

0.0%
17.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

24.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

8.9%

Technology

VGT
98.5%
HDV
9.7%

Communication Services

VGT
0.5%
HDV
0.1%

Financial Services

VGT
0.5%
HDV
10.8%

Industrials

VGT
0.4%
HDV
1.3%

Energy

VGT
0.3%
HDV
21.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VGT
0.1%
HDV
6.0%

Basic Materials

VGT
0.0%
HDV
1.1%

Healthcare

VGT
0.0%
HDV
17.0%

Consumer Defensive

VGT

-

HDV
24.2%

Real Estate

VGT

-

HDV

-

Utilities

VGT

-

HDV
8.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGT vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGT vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGTHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.36

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

4.00

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.55

11.07

-0.53

VGT vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGT vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and HDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGTHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-37.04%

-17.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

-5.18%

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

-10.49%

-16.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

-15.42%

-19.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

-37.04%

+1.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.01%

-1.31%

-2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-3.08%

-4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.29%

1.87%

+3.42%

Volatility

VGT vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 10.42% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.28%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGTHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.42%

3.28%

+7.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.28%

7.53%

+10.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.20%

9.79%

+12.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.45%

12.84%

+12.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.75%

15.74%

+9.01%

VGT vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGT vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than HDV's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
3.56%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.32%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGT and HDV have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to HDV (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs HDV's -37.04%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.72% vs 9.36% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.72% return vs 9.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.32% for VGT.

VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while HDV is Dividend. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.08% for HDV.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGT and HDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer