VGT vs. AUMI

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and AUMI (Themes Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while AUMI is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VGT returned 47.99% vs 38.38% for AUMI. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for AUMI.

Performance

VGT vs. AUMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.03% return, which is significantly higher than AUMI's -11.62% return.

VGT

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 2.90%
• YTD: 24.03%
• 6M: 24.13%
• 1Y: 47.99%
• 3Y*: 29.84%
• 5Y*: 20.35%
• 10Y*: 25.19%

AUMI

• 1D: 2.52%
• 1M: -18.86%
• YTD: -11.62%
• 6M: -9.97%
• 1Y: 38.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGT vs. AUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	24.03%	21.77%	29.30%	2.38%
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF	-11.62%	164.18%	30.61%	10.23%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and AUMI is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2023	0.24

VGT vs. AUMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VGT	AUMI
Technology	98.5%	-
Communication Services	0.5%	0.1%
Financial Services	0.5%	-
Industrials	0.4%	-
Energy	0.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	99.4%
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

VGT vs. AUMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 70
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 72
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 59

AUMI

AUMI Risk / Return Rank: 25
AUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
AUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
AUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 28
AUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
AUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGT vs. AUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VGT	AUMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	0.78	+1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	1.24	+1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.17	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	0.98	+1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.11	2.81	+6.30

VGT vs. AUMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the AUMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and AUMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VGT vs. AUMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than AUMI's maximum drawdown of -39.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and AUMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	VGT	AUMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.63%	-39.28%	-15.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.40%	-39.28%	+22.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.18%	-33.51%	+26.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.95%	-7.35%	-0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.28%	13.72%	-8.44%

Volatility

VGT vs. AUMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is 10.00%, while Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) has a volatility of 17.47%. This indicates that VGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VGT	AUMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.00%	17.47%	-7.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.00%	40.45%	-22.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.00%	49.48%	-27.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.40%	42.24%	-16.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.72%	42.24%	-17.52%

VGT vs. AUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than AUMI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

VGT vs. AUMI - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than AUMI's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF	0.98%	0.86%	1.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.33%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VGT and AUMI in my portfolio?

VGT and AUMI have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VGT or AUMI?

AUMI has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to VGT (10.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs AUMI's -39.28%.

Which ETF is better, VGT or AUMI?

On 1-year performance, VGT leads with 47.99% vs 38.38% for AUMI. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 10.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VGT or AUMI?

Over the 1-year period, VGT has performed better with a 47.99% return vs 38.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VGT or AUMI?

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AUMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VGT or AUMI?

AUMI has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

What is the main difference between VGT and AUMI?

VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while AUMI is Gold. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while AUMI tracks Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.35% for AUMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.