PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGLT vs. PHYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGLT vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGLT achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly higher than PHYS's -3.85% return. Over the past 10 years, VGLT has underperformed PHYS with an annualized return of -1.21%, while PHYS has yielded a comparatively higher 11.42% annualized return.


VGLT

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.30%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.49%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
-0.30%
5Y*
-5.52%
10Y*
-1.21%

PHYS

1D
0.19%
1M
-10.61%
YTD
-3.85%
6M
-3.47%
1Y
22.63%
3Y*
28.00%
5Y*
16.26%
10Y*
11.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGLT vs. PHYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
0.03%5.35%-6.28%3.27%-29.34%-4.98%17.57%14.30%-1.54%8.64%
PHYS
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
-3.85%63.95%26.43%12.98%-1.81%-4.84%23.89%18.14%-2.64%12.78%

Correlation

The correlation between VGLT and PHYS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2010

0.23

The correlation between VGLT and PHYS shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGLT vs. PHYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGLT
VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

PHYS
PHYS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PHYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYS Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGLT vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGLTPHYSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.17

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

0.92

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.19

2.64

-1.45

VGLT vs. PHYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the PHYS Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGLT and PHYS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGLT vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGLT drawdown since its inception was -46.18%, roughly equal to the maximum PHYS drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGLT and PHYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGLTPHYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.18%

-48.16%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-24.80%

+17.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.68%

-24.80%

+7.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.98%

-24.80%

-16.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.18%

-24.80%

-21.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.55%

-22.43%

-14.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.09%

-20.99%

+5.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

8.60%

-5.82%

Volatility

VGLT vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) is 2.69%, while Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that VGLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGLTPHYSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

7.80%

-5.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.09%

24.75%

-18.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.78%

28.17%

-19.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

18.53%

-3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.82%

16.41%

-2.59%

Dividends

VGLT vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison

VGLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, while PHYS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHYS
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
4.59%4.44%4.33%3.33%2.84%1.82%2.15%2.46%2.71%2.55%2.69%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGLT and PHYS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHYS has higher volatility (7.80%) compared to VGLT (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGLT dropped -46.18% vs PHYS's -48.16%.

PHYS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGLT and PHYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer