VFMV vs. CSD
VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) and CSD (Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. VFMV is actively managed, while CSD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFMV returned 9.87%/yr vs 16.53%/yr for CSD. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VFMV charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CSD.
Performance
VFMV vs. CSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFMV achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly lower than CSD's 40.17% return.
VFMV
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 13.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- —
CSD
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 40.17%
- 6M
- 38.88%
- 1Y
- 73.14%
- 3Y*
- 37.02%
- 5Y*
- 16.53%
- 10Y*
- 14.06%
VFMV vs. CSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 8.76% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -1.10% |
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF | 40.17% | 21.58% | 27.61% | 23.77% | -15.04% | 13.01% | 10.79% | 20.61% | -19.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFMV and CSD is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between VFMV and CSD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
VFMV vs. CSD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFMV
CSD
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VFMV
CSD
Communication Services
VFMV
CSD
Financial Services
VFMV
CSD
Industrials
VFMV
CSD
Healthcare
VFMV
CSD
Consumer Defensive
VFMV
CSD
-
Consumer Cyclical
VFMV
CSD
Utilities
VFMV
CSD
Real Estate
VFMV
CSD
Energy
VFMV
CSD
-
Basic Materials
VFMV
-
CSD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFMV vs. CSD — Risk / Return Rank
VFMV
CSD
VFMV vs. CSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFMV | CSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.50 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 6.48 | -4.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 25.42 | -16.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFMV | CSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 3.09 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.71 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.43 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
VFMV vs. CSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFMV drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum CSD drawdown of -70.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMV and CSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFMV | CSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.64% | -70.47% | +36.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.00% | -11.34% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.35% | -30.15% | +19.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.41% | -30.15% | +14.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | 0.00% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -14.23% | +10.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 2.89% | -1.36% |
Volatility
VFMV vs. CSD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) is 2.04%, while Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that VFMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFMV | CSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.04% | 5.60% | -3.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.30% | 18.29% | -11.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.80% | 23.82% | -15.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 23.26% | -11.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 24.83% | -10.58% |
VFMV vs. CSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFMV has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CSD's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFMV vs. CSD - Dividend Comparison
VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than CSD's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.51% | 0.86% | 0.73% | 0.99% | 1.08% | 0.99% | 0.60% | 1.62% | 2.61% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.93% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFMV and CSD have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSD has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to VFMV (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMV dropped -33.64% vs CSD's -70.47%.
On 5-year performance, CSD leads with 16.53% vs 9.87% for VFMV. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CSD has performed better with a 16.53% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSD.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.11% for CSD.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMV and 0.65% for CSD.
CSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFMV and CSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer