PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMF vs. QVMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VFMF vs. QVMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VFMF vs. QVMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
3.32%17.38%15.60%18.52%-5.70%7.07%
QVMM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF
3.32%8.82%13.36%15.43%-13.06%6.04%

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with VFMF at 3.32% and QVMM at 3.32%.


VFMF

1D
1.80%
1M
-4.04%
YTD
3.32%
6M
8.39%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*

QVMM

1D
2.76%
1M
-4.92%
YTD
3.32%
6M
5.26%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VFMF vs. QVMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than QVMM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

VFMF vs. QVMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMF
VFMF Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VFMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMF Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

QVMM
QVMM Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QVMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVMM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QVMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVMM Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMF vs. QVMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFMFQVMMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

0.91

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

1.40

+0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.20

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.35

+0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.90

6.02

+2.87

VFMF vs. QVMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the QVMM Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMF and QVMM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFMFQVMMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

0.91

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.34

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between VFMF and QVMM is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VFMF vs. QVMM - Dividend Comparison

VFMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than QVMM's 1.29% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
1.53%1.54%1.60%1.78%2.21%1.39%1.56%1.61%1.22%
QVMM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.29%1.32%1.29%1.42%1.51%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VFMF vs. QVMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMF drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, which is greater than QVMM's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMF and QVMM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMFQVMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.34%

-24.00%

-17.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-14.17%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.99%

-5.77%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-7.29%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

3.17%

-0.29%

Volatility

VFMF vs. QVMM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) is 4.62%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that VFMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QVMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VFMFQVMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

6.32%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

11.56%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.79%

20.79%

-2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.25%

19.61%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

19.61%

+1.70%