VFMF vs. QVMM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VFMF (Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF) and QVMM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF) are both Multi-factor funds. Over the past 3 years, VFMF returned 23.25%/yr vs 17.19%/yr for QVMM. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VFMF charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QVMM.

Performance

VFMF vs. QVMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMF achieves a 16.18% return, which is significantly higher than QVMM's 14.85% return.

VFMF

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 2.93%
• YTD: 16.18%
• 6M: 17.39%
• 1Y: 35.69%
• 3Y*: 23.25%
• 5Y*: 13.18%
• 10Y*: —

QVMM

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 2.60%
• YTD: 14.85%
• 6M: 14.84%
• 1Y: 27.01%
• 3Y*: 17.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMF vs. QVMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
VFMF Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF	16.18%	17.38%	15.60%	18.52%	-5.70%	7.07%
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF	14.85%	8.82%	13.36%	15.43%	-13.06%	6.04%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMF and QVMM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.95

The correlation between VFMF and QVMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFMF vs. QVMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VFMF	QVMM
Financial Services	24.6%	15.2%
Healthcare	16.9%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	13.6%	10.0%
Technology	12.7%	13.8%
Industrials	9.0%	26.5%
Energy	7.3%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	4.0%
Communication Services	5.0%	0.9%
Basic Materials	3.4%	4.7%
Real Estate	0.3%	7.6%
Utilities	0.2%	3.3%

Return for Risk

VFMF vs. QVMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMF

VFMF Risk / Return Rank: 86
VFMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
VFMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
VFMF Omega Ratio Rank: 81
VFMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
VFMF Martin Ratio Rank: 88

QVMM

QVMM Risk / Return Rank: 58
QVMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
QVMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QVMM Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QVMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
QVMM Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMF vs. QVMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VFMF	QVMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	1.78	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.89	2.59	+1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.31	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.07	3.27	+1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.02	11.75	+7.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VFMF vs. QVMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the QVMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMF and QVMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VFMF	QVMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	1.78	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.45	+0.13

Drawdowns

VFMF vs. QVMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMF drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, which is greater than QVMM's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMF and QVMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFMF	QVMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.34%	-24.00%	-17.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.08%	-8.30%	+1.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.57%	-24.00%	+3.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.74%	-7.08%	+1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	2.30%	-0.42%

Volatility

VFMF vs. QVMM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) is 2.93%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that VFMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QVMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFMF	QVMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.93%	4.51%	-1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.13%	11.21%	-2.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.16%	15.23%	-2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.10%	19.47%	-1.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.15%	19.47%	+1.68%

VFMF vs. QVMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than QVMM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VFMF vs. QVMM - Dividend Comparison

VFMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than QVMM's 1.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF	1.16%	1.32%	1.29%	1.42%	1.51%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VFMF Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF	1.36%	1.54%	1.60%	1.78%	2.21%	1.39%	1.56%	1.61%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VFMF and QVMM in my portfolio?

VFMF and QVMM have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VFMF or QVMM?

QVMM has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to VFMF (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMF dropped -41.34% vs QVMM's -24.00%.

Which ETF is better, VFMF or QVMM?

On 3-year performance, VFMF leads with 23.25% vs 17.19% for QVMM. On fees, QVMM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, VFMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VFMF or QVMM?

Over the 3-year period, VFMF has performed better with a 23.25% return vs 17.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VFMF or QVMM?

QVMM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for VFMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VFMF or QVMM?

VFMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.16% for QVMM.

What is the main difference between VFMF and QVMM?

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for VFMF and 0.15% for QVMM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VFMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.