PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMF vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMF vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMF achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 19.12% return.


VFMF

1D
0.77%
1M
2.97%
YTD
15.37%
6M
17.78%
1Y
35.24%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*

AVUV

1D
0.92%
1M
1.01%
YTD
19.12%
6M
20.66%
1Y
39.89%
3Y*
19.63%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMF vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
15.37%17.38%15.60%18.52%-5.70%30.05%4.99%7.84%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
19.12%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMF and AVUV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.93

The correlation between VFMF and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFMF vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFMF
AVUV

Financial Services

24.6%
25.8%

Healthcare

16.9%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
18.0%

Technology

12.7%
7.0%

Industrials

9.0%
13.9%

Energy

7.3%
18.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
4.5%

Communication Services

5.0%
2.8%

Basic Materials

3.4%
4.9%

Real Estate

0.3%
0.7%

Utilities

0.2%
0.1%

Financial Services

VFMF
24.6%
AVUV
25.8%

Healthcare

VFMF
16.9%
AVUV
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VFMF
13.6%
AVUV
18.0%

Technology

VFMF
12.7%
AVUV
7.0%

Industrials

VFMF
9.0%
AVUV
13.9%

Energy

VFMF
7.3%
AVUV
18.2%

Consumer Defensive

VFMF
6.8%
AVUV
4.5%

Communication Services

VFMF
5.0%
AVUV
2.8%

Basic Materials

VFMF
3.4%
AVUV
4.9%

Real Estate

VFMF
0.3%
AVUV
0.7%

Utilities

VFMF
0.2%
AVUV
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMF vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMF
VFMF Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VFMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMF Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMF vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFMFAVUVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.70

2.29

+0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.85

3.26

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.40

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.95

4.99

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.61

14.84

+3.77

VFMF vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMF and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFMFAVUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.29

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.48

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.56

+0.01

Drawdowns

VFMF vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMF drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMF and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMFAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.34%

-49.42%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-7.95%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-28.79%

+8.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.57%

-28.79%

+8.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.15%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-7.96%

+2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.67%

-0.79%

Volatility

VFMF vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) is 2.99%, while Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that VFMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMFAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

4.14%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

11.28%

-2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

17.50%

-4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.10%

22.73%

-4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.16%

28.30%

-7.14%

VFMF vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFMF vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

VFMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than AVUV's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.28%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
1.37%1.54%1.60%1.78%2.21%1.39%1.56%1.61%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, VFMF and AVUV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVUV has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to VFMF (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMF dropped -41.34% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, VFMF leads with 13.12% vs 10.93% for AVUV. On fees, VFMF is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, VFMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VFMF has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFMF is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.

VFMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.28% for AVUV.

VFMF is categorized as Multi-factor, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for VFMF and 0.25% for AVUV.

VFMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMF and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer