PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVMM vs. IVOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVMM vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QVMM having a 15.32% return and IVOO slightly lower at 14.65%.


QVMM

1D
-0.92%
1M
2.93%
YTD
15.32%
6M
13.35%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
10Y*

IVOO

1D
-1.01%
1M
2.69%
YTD
14.65%
6M
12.56%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
16.08%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
11.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVMM vs. IVOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QVMM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF
15.32%8.82%13.36%15.43%-13.06%6.20%
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
14.65%7.47%13.77%16.45%-13.17%6.10%

Correlation

The correlation between QVMM and IVOO is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.99

The correlation between QVMM and IVOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVMM vs. IVOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVMM
IVOO

Industrials

26.1%
24.7%

Technology

15.6%
17.8%

Financial Services

14.7%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.6%

Healthcare

9.2%
9.0%

Real Estate

7.4%
7.3%

Energy

4.9%
4.9%

Basic Materials

4.8%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
3.3%

Utilities

3.2%
2.9%

Communication Services

0.8%
1.0%

Industrials

QVMM
26.1%
IVOO
24.7%

Technology

QVMM
15.6%
IVOO
17.8%

Financial Services

QVMM
14.7%
IVOO
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

QVMM
9.8%
IVOO
10.6%

Healthcare

QVMM
9.2%
IVOO
9.0%

Real Estate

QVMM
7.4%
IVOO
7.3%

Energy

QVMM
4.9%
IVOO
4.9%

Basic Materials

QVMM
4.8%
IVOO
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

QVMM
3.6%
IVOO
3.3%

Utilities

QVMM
3.2%
IVOO
2.9%

Communication Services

QVMM
0.8%
IVOO
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVMM vs. IVOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVMM
QVMM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QVMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVMM Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QVMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVMM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOO
IVOO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IVOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVMM vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QVMMIVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

2.87

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.53

10.47

+1.06

QVMM vs. IVOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the IVOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVMM and IVOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QVMM vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVMM drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum IVOO drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMM and IVOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVMMIVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-42.33%

+18.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-8.81%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.00%

-24.22%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-1.12%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-5.25%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

2.41%

-0.10%

Volatility

QVMM vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVMMIVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

4.73%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.61%

11.77%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.58%

15.89%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.46%

19.74%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.46%

21.19%

-1.73%

QVMM vs. IVOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVMM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOO's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QVMM vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison

QVMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than IVOO's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
1.19%1.35%1.30%1.25%1.58%1.14%1.23%1.49%1.56%1.22%1.37%1.45%
QVMM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.15%1.32%1.29%1.42%1.51%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, QVMM and IVOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVOO has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to QVMM (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMM dropped -24.00% vs IVOO's -42.33%.

On 3-year performance, QVMM leads with 16.66% vs 16.08% for IVOO. On fees, IVOO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, QVMM has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QVMM has performed better with a 16.66% return vs 16.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QVMM.

IVOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 1.15% for QVMM.

QVMM is categorized as Multi-factor, while IVOO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. QVMM tracks S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QVMM and 0.07% for IVOO.

QVMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVMM and IVOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer