QVMM vs. IVOO
QVMM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF) and IVOO (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVMM is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IVOO is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QVMM returned 16.61%/yr vs 16.07%/yr for IVOO. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QVMM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IVOO.
Performance
QVMM vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QVMM having a 14.36% return and IVOO slightly lower at 14.15%.
QVMM
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- 14.36%
- 6M
- 15.44%
- 1Y
- 27.91%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVOO
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 14.15%
- 6M
- 15.23%
- 1Y
- 27.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
QVMM vs. IVOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 14.36% | 8.82% | 13.36% | 15.43% | -13.06% | 6.04% |
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 14.15% | 7.47% | 13.77% | 16.45% | -13.17% | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVMM and IVOO is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.99 |
The correlation between QVMM and IVOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
QVMM vs. IVOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QVMM
IVOO
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
QVMM
IVOO
Financial Services
QVMM
IVOO
Technology
QVMM
IVOO
Consumer Cyclical
QVMM
IVOO
Healthcare
QVMM
IVOO
Real Estate
QVMM
IVOO
Energy
QVMM
IVOO
Basic Materials
QVMM
IVOO
Consumer Defensive
QVMM
IVOO
Utilities
QVMM
IVOO
Communication Services
QVMM
IVOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVMM vs. IVOO — Risk / Return Rank
QVMM
IVOO
QVMM vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVMM | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 1.75 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.67 | 2.54 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.31 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 3.06 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.89 | 11.19 | +0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVMM | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 1.75 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.62 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
QVMM vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVMM drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum IVOO drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMM and IVOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVMM | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.00% | -42.33% | +18.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -8.81% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.00% | -24.22% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -5.27% | -1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 2.41% | -0.11% |
Volatility
QVMM vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) at 4.46%. This indicates that QVMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVMM | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 4.46% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.23% | 11.38% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.29% | 15.56% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.49% | 19.73% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.49% | 21.20% | -1.71% |
QVMM vs. IVOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVMM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOO's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QVMM vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison
QVMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than IVOO's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 1.19% | 1.35% | 1.30% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 1.14% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.45% |
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 1.16% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, QVMM and IVOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QVMM has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to IVOO (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMM dropped -24.00% vs IVOO's -42.33%.
On 3-year performance, QVMM leads with 16.61% vs 16.07% for IVOO. On fees, IVOO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QVMM has performed better with a 16.61% return vs 16.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QVMM.
IVOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 1.16% for QVMM.
QVMM is categorized as Multi-factor, while IVOO is Small Cap Growth Equities. QVMM tracks S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QVMM and 0.10% for IVOO.
QVMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVMM and IVOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer