PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMF vs. VFMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMF vs. VFMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) and Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Admiral Shares (VFMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMF achieves a 16.99% return, which is significantly higher than VFMFX's 15.77% return.


VFMF

1D
0.60%
1M
2.90%
YTD
16.99%
6M
15.15%
1Y
36.83%
3Y*
22.51%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*

VFMFX

1D
0.24%
1M
2.06%
YTD
15.77%
6M
13.99%
1Y
33.42%
3Y*
20.89%
5Y*
14.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMF vs. VFMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
16.99%17.38%15.60%18.52%-5.70%30.05%4.99%22.34%-14.45%
VFMFX
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Admiral Shares
15.77%14.50%17.21%17.89%-5.78%30.78%3.58%21.81%-14.83%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMF and VFMFX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.99

The correlation between VFMF and VFMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMF vs. VFMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMF
VFMF Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VFMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VFMFX
VFMFX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VFMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMF vs. VFMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) and Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Admiral Shares (VFMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFMFVFMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.44

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.23

4.62

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.65

17.19

+2.46

VFMF vs. VFMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the VFMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMF and VFMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFMF vs. VFMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMF drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, roughly equal to the maximum VFMFX drawdown of -41.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMF and VFMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMFVFMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.34%

-41.18%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-7.31%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-21.18%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.57%

-21.18%

+0.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-1.35%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-5.86%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.96%

-0.08%

Volatility

VFMF vs. VFMFX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) and Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Admiral Shares (VFMFX) have volatilities of 3.55% and 3.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMFVFMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

3.44%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

9.39%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.27%

13.28%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.06%

18.02%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.12%

21.21%

-0.09%

VFMF vs. VFMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VFMF and VFMFX have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFMF vs. VFMFX - Dividend Comparison

VFMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than VFMFX's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
1.00%1.54%1.60%1.78%2.21%1.39%1.56%1.61%1.22%
VFMFX
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor Fund Admiral Shares
2.36%2.69%3.29%1.66%2.09%1.37%1.48%1.63%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, VFMF and VFMFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VFMF has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to VFMFX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMF dropped -41.34% vs VFMFX's -41.18%.

VFMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMF and VFMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer