QVMM vs. XMHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ).
QVMM and XMHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QVMM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jun 30, 2021. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. Both QVMM and XMHQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QVMM or XMHQ.
Key characteristics
| QVMM | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.97% | 24.82% |
| 1Y Return | 36.99% | 39.14% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.81% | 11.01% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.25 | 2.15 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.17 | 3.04 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.39 | 1.36 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.65 | 3.78 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.14 | 9.28 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.80% | 4.20% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.37% | 18.13% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.40% | -58.19% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.96% | -0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVMM and XMHQ is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QVMM vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, QVMM achieves a 19.97% return, which is significantly lower than XMHQ's 24.82% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QVMM vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVMM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QVMM vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QVMM vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison
QVMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than XMHQ's 4.83% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 4.83% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.64% | 1.34% | 1.25% | 1.11% |
Drawdowns
QVMM vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVMM drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMM and XMHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QVMM vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) have volatilities of 5.48% and 5.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.