QVMM vs. PAMC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QVMM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF) and PAMC (Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVMM is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while PAMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QVMM returned 16.65%/yr vs 18.46%/yr for PAMC. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QVMM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PAMC.

Performance

QVMM vs. PAMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVMM achieves a 14.47% return, which is significantly lower than PAMC's 17.95% return.

QVMM

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 14.47%
• 6M: 14.87%
• 1Y: 26.39%
• 3Y*: 16.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PAMC

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 5.18%
• YTD: 17.95%
• 6M: 18.02%
• 1Y: 28.44%
• 3Y*: 18.46%
• 5Y*: 8.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVMM vs. PAMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF	14.47%	8.82%	13.36%	15.43%	-13.06%	6.04%
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	17.95%	1.54%	26.20%	19.30%	-12.15%	-1.44%

Correlation

The correlation between QVMM and PAMC is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.95

The correlation between QVMM and PAMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVMM vs. PAMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QVMM	PAMC
Industrials	26.5%	25.6%
Financial Services	15.2%	16.5%
Technology	13.8%	14.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	12.1%
Healthcare	8.7%	3.4%
Real Estate	7.6%	4.1%
Energy	5.5%	10.8%
Basic Materials	4.7%	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	4.2%
Utilities	3.3%	3.1%
Communication Services	0.9%	0.8%

Return for Risk

QVMM vs. PAMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVMM

QVMM Risk / Return Rank: 56
QVMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QVMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
QVMM Omega Ratio Rank: 49
QVMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QVMM Martin Ratio Rank: 64

PAMC

PAMC Risk / Return Rank: 50
PAMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
PAMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
PAMC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PAMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PAMC Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVMM vs. PAMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QVMM	PAMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.55	+0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	2.26	+0.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.29	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	2.79	+0.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.48	10.32	+1.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QVMM vs. PAMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the PAMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVMM and PAMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QVMM	PAMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	1.55	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.77	-0.33

Drawdowns

QVMM vs. PAMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVMM drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum PAMC drawdown of -27.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMM and PAMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	QVMM	PAMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.00%	-27.04%	+3.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.30%	-10.24%	+1.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.00%	-26.07%	+2.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.09%	-7.47%	+0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	2.76%	-0.46%

Volatility

QVMM vs. PAMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) is 4.63%, while Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that QVMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QVMM	PAMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	5.65%	-1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.21%	14.17%	-2.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.28%	18.44%	-3.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.48%	20.40%	-0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.48%	20.73%	-1.25%

QVMM vs. PAMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVMM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PAMC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QVMM vs. PAMC - Dividend Comparison

QVMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than PAMC's 1.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	1.10%	1.11%	0.97%	0.69%	1.29%	0.36%	0.30%
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF	1.16%	1.32%	1.29%	1.42%	1.51%	0.60%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QVMM and PAMC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, QVMM and PAMC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QVMM or PAMC?

PAMC has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to QVMM (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMM dropped -24.00% vs PAMC's -27.04%.

Which ETF is better, QVMM or PAMC?

On 3-year performance, PAMC leads with 18.46% vs 16.65% for QVMM. On fees, QVMM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QVMM has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QVMM or PAMC?

Over the 3-year period, PAMC has performed better with a 18.46% return vs 16.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QVMM or PAMC?

QVMM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PAMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QVMM or PAMC?

QVMM has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 1.10% for PAMC.

What is the main difference between QVMM and PAMC?

QVMM is categorized as Multi-factor, while PAMC is Mid Cap Growth Equities. QVMM tracks S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while PAMC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QVMM and 0.60% for PAMC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QVMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.