VFLO vs. SCHG
VFLO (Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFLO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VFLO returned 41.32% vs 27.05% for SCHG. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VFLO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
VFLO vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFLO achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.74% return.
VFLO
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 11.31%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 23.01%
- 1Y
- 41.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 7.31%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 25.53%
- 5Y*
- 16.21%
- 10Y*
- 18.92%
VFLO vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VFLO Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF | 20.63% | 17.51% | 21.83% | 14.59% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 7.74% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 12.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFLO and SCHG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023 | 0.50 |
VFLO vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFLO
SCHG
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Utilities
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
VFLO
SCHG
Healthcare
VFLO
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
VFLO
SCHG
Energy
VFLO
SCHG
Communication Services
VFLO
SCHG
Basic Materials
VFLO
SCHG
Industrials
VFLO
SCHG
Utilities
VFLO
SCHG
Financial Services
VFLO
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
VFLO
SCHG
Real Estate
VFLO
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFLO vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
VFLO
SCHG
VFLO vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFLO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.77 | 1.76 | +1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.97 | 2.37 | +1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.31 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.42 | 1.70 | +6.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.77 | 5.70 | +20.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFLO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 1.76 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.65 | 0.85 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
VFLO vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFLO drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFLO and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFLO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.79% | -34.59% | +16.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.98% | -16.41% | +11.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -0.57% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -5.20% | +2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 4.90% | -3.27% |
Volatility
VFLO vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.31%. This indicates that VFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFLO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 3.31% | +2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.03% | 11.56% | -0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.02% | 15.45% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 22.27% | -6.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 21.55% | -5.61% |
VFLO vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFLO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFLO vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
VFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
VFLO Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.18% | 1.60% | 1.20% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFLO and SCHG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFLO has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to SCHG (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFLO dropped -17.79% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 1-year performance, VFLO leads with 41.32% vs 27.05% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VFLO has performed better with a 41.32% return vs 27.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for VFLO.
VFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.
VFLO is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VFLO tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for VFLO and 0.04% for SCHG.
VFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFLO and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer