PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFLO vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VFLO vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VFLO vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VFLO
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF
0.38%17.51%21.83%14.59%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
4.30%8.98%10.64%13.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFLO achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 4.30% return.


VFLO

1D
2.23%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
0.38%
6M
5.99%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COWZ

1D
1.08%
1M
-3.36%
YTD
4.30%
6M
10.31%
1Y
16.75%
3Y*
12.26%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VFLO vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFLO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VFLO vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFLO
VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFLO vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFLOCOWZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

0.96

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

1.44

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.30

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.12

6.06

+0.06

VFLO vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFLO Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFLO and COWZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFLOCOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.96

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.63

+0.63

Correlation

The correlation between VFLO and COWZ is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VFLO vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

VFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than COWZ's 2.06% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
VFLO
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF
1.42%1.60%1.20%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.06%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%

Drawdowns

VFLO vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFLO drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFLO and COWZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VFLOCOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-38.63%

+20.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.49%

-13.55%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-3.36%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-4.85%

+2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.91%

-0.05%

Volatility

VFLO vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 3.00%. This indicates that VFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VFLOCOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

3.00%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

8.36%

+1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.67%

17.50%

+2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.76%

17.73%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

20.08%

-4.32%