PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFLO vs. QVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFLO vs. QVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFLO achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than QVAL's 14.95% return.


VFLO

1D
-1.64%
1M
11.31%
YTD
20.63%
6M
23.01%
1Y
41.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QVAL

1D
-0.05%
1M
3.06%
YTD
14.95%
6M
16.83%
1Y
31.09%
3Y*
21.75%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
11.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFLO vs. QVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VFLO
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF
20.63%17.51%21.83%14.59%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
14.95%10.98%12.21%22.57%

Correlation

The correlation between VFLO and QVAL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023

0.85

The correlation between VFLO and QVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFLO vs. QVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFLO
QVAL

Technology

38.4%
16.7%

Healthcare

17.9%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

17.2%
32.4%

Energy

12.2%
5.5%

Communication Services

4.7%
3.8%

Basic Materials

4.3%
7.6%

Industrials

3.4%
15.0%

Utilities

1.7%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
7.9%

Real Estate

0.0%
2.0%

Technology

VFLO
38.4%
QVAL
16.7%

Healthcare

VFLO
17.9%
QVAL
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VFLO
17.2%
QVAL
32.4%

Energy

VFLO
12.2%
QVAL
5.5%

Communication Services

VFLO
4.7%
QVAL
3.8%

Basic Materials

VFLO
4.3%
QVAL
7.6%

Industrials

VFLO
3.4%
QVAL
15.0%

Utilities

VFLO
1.7%
QVAL

-

Financial Services

VFLO
0.0%
QVAL

-

Consumer Defensive

VFLO
0.0%
QVAL
7.9%

Real Estate

VFLO
0.0%
QVAL
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFLO vs. QVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFLO
VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFLO vs. QVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFLOQVALDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.77

2.16

+0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.97

3.34

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.37

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.42

5.09

+3.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

25.77

14.45

+11.32

VFLO vs. QVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFLO Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the QVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFLO and QVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFLOQVALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

2.16

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.65

0.49

+1.16

Drawdowns

VFLO vs. QVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFLO drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum QVAL drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFLO and QVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFLOQVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-51.49%

+33.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.98%

-6.04%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-0.55%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-7.80%

+5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

2.13%

-0.50%

Volatility

VFLO vs. QVAL - Volatility Comparison

Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) at 4.47%. This indicates that VFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFLOQVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

4.47%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

10.05%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.02%

14.44%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

21.63%

-5.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

22.79%

-6.85%

VFLO vs. QVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFLO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QVAL's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFLO vs. QVAL - Dividend Comparison

VFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than QVAL's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.46%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%
VFLO
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF
1.18%1.60%1.20%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFLO and QVAL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFLO has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to QVAL (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFLO dropped -17.79% vs QVAL's -51.49%.

On 1-year performance, VFLO leads with 41.32% vs 31.09% for QVAL. On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, QVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VFLO has performed better with a 41.32% return vs 31.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for VFLO.

QVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.18% for VFLO.

VFLO is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while QVAL is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Victory and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for VFLO and 0.28% for QVAL.

VFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFLO and QVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer