PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFH vs. KBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFH vs. KBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly lower than KBE's 2.87% return. Over the past 10 years, VFH has outperformed KBE with an annualized return of 12.20%, while KBE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.19% annualized return.


VFH

1D
-1.39%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
-6.40%
6M
-3.96%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
12.20%

KBE

1D
-2.28%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
2.87%
6M
4.27%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFH vs. KBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
-6.40%14.91%30.44%14.17%-12.31%35.22%-1.96%31.57%-13.52%19.99%
KBE
SPDR S&P Bank ETF
2.87%12.36%23.78%5.30%-14.83%33.46%-8.75%29.78%-19.65%10.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VFH and KBE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.91

The correlation between VFH and KBE shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VFH vs. KBE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFH
KBE

Financial Services

96.8%
100.0%

Technology

2.1%

-

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

VFH
96.8%
KBE
100.0%

Technology

VFH
2.1%
KBE

-

Real Estate

VFH
0.8%
KBE

-

Industrials

VFH
0.2%
KBE

-

Healthcare

VFH
0.1%
KBE

-

Communication Services

VFH
0.0%
KBE

-

Consumer Cyclical

VFH
0.0%
KBE

-

Basic Materials

VFH

-

KBE

-

Consumer Defensive

VFH

-

KBE

-

Energy

VFH

-

KBE

-

Utilities

VFH

-

KBE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFH vs. KBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

KBE
KBE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
KBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
KBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFH vs. KBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFHKBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.17

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

1.29

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

3.39

-2.95

VFH vs. KBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFH Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the KBE Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFH and KBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFHKBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

0.87

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.19

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.31

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.10

+0.14

Drawdowns

VFH vs. KBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, smaller than the maximum KBE drawdown of -83.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and KBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFHKBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.61%

-83.15%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-14.63%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.30%

-25.97%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-45.25%

+19.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.42%

-53.14%

+8.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.24%

-7.38%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-27.54%

+9.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.55%

5.55%

0.00%

Volatility

VFH vs. KBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) is 3.34%, while SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that VFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFHKBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

5.65%

-2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.10%

14.93%

-3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.79%

21.62%

-6.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.31%

27.36%

-8.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.54%

29.85%

-7.31%

VFH vs. KBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than KBE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFH vs. KBE - Dividend Comparison

VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than KBE's 2.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBE
SPDR S&P Bank ETF
2.39%2.51%2.35%2.78%2.99%2.16%2.44%2.33%2.18%1.36%1.39%1.70%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.56%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFH and KBE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBE has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to VFH (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs KBE's -83.15%.

On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 12.20% vs 9.19% for KBE. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 12.20% return vs 9.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KBE.

KBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 1.56% for VFH.

VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while KBE tracks S&P Banks Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VFH and 0.35% for KBE.

KBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFH and KBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer