KBE vs. KBWP
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP).
KBE and KBWP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KBE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Banks Select Industry Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2005. KBWP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR). It was launched on Dec 2, 2010. Both KBE and KBWP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KBE or KBWP.
Correlation
The correlation between KBE and KBWP is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
KBE vs. KBWP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KBE:
0.99
KBWP:
2.06
KBE:
1.62
KBWP:
2.72
KBE:
1.20
KBWP:
1.38
KBE:
1.05
KBWP:
3.45
KBE:
5.51
KBWP:
11.90
KBE:
4.68%
KBWP:
2.74%
KBE:
26.10%
KBWP:
15.81%
KBE:
-83.15%
KBWP:
-39.77%
KBE:
-11.03%
KBWP:
-7.87%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBE achieves a 23.85% return, which is significantly lower than KBWP's 30.02% return. Over the past 10 years, KBE has underperformed KBWP with an annualized return of 7.63%, while KBWP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.89% annualized return.
KBE
23.85%
-5.95%
26.33%
24.55%
6.14%
7.63%
KBWP
30.02%
-3.95%
13.02%
32.06%
12.62%
12.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KBE vs. KBWP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both KBE and KBWP have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KBE vs. KBWP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KBE vs. KBWP - Dividend Comparison
KBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than KBWP's 0.97% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBE SPDR S&P Bank ETF | 1.73% | 2.78% | 2.99% | 2.16% | 2.44% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.35% | 1.39% | 1.69% | 1.59% | 1.37% |
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF | 0.97% | 1.68% | 1.99% | 3.02% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 2.11% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 1.35% | 2.73% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
KBE vs. KBWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBE drawdown since its inception was -83.15%, which is greater than KBWP's maximum drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBE and KBWP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KBE vs. KBWP - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) at 5.14%. This indicates that KBE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KBWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.