KBE vs. FNCL
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL).
KBE and FNCL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KBE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Banks Select Industry Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2005. FNCL is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Financials Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both KBE and FNCL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KBE or FNCL.
Performance
KBE vs. FNCL - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBE achieves a 33.69% return, which is significantly lower than FNCL's 35.60% return. Over the past 10 years, KBE has underperformed FNCL with an annualized return of 8.53%, while FNCL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.98% annualized return.
KBE
33.69%
10.56%
33.02%
57.32%
8.66%
8.53%
FNCL
35.60%
7.55%
24.24%
47.47%
13.15%
11.98%
Key characteristics
| KBE | FNCL | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.18 | 3.29 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.21 | 4.67 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.39 | 1.60 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.86 | 3.78 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.22 | 23.48 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.40% | 2.05% |
| Daily Std Dev | 26.61% | 14.64% |
| Max Drawdown | -83.15% | -44.38% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.52% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KBE vs. FNCL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between KBE and FNCL is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KBE vs. FNCL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KBE vs. FNCL - Dividend Comparison
KBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than FNCL's 1.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBE SPDR S&P Bank ETF | 2.17% | 2.78% | 2.99% | 2.16% | 2.44% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.35% | 1.39% | 1.69% | 1.59% | 1.37% |
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | 1.40% | 1.91% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.37% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 2.17% | 1.77% | 0.43% |
Drawdowns
KBE vs. FNCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBE drawdown since its inception was -83.15%, which is greater than FNCL's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBE and FNCL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KBE vs. FNCL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) has a higher volatility of 13.10% compared to Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) at 7.63%. This indicates that KBE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.