PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFH vs. IYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFH vs. IYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VFH having a -6.40% return and IYG slightly lower at -6.51%. Over the past 10 years, VFH has underperformed IYG with an annualized return of 12.20%, while IYG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.37% annualized return.


VFH

1D
-1.39%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
-6.40%
6M
-3.96%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
12.20%

IYG

1D
-1.15%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
-6.51%
6M
-4.06%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
20.32%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
13.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFH vs. IYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
-6.40%14.91%30.44%14.17%-12.31%35.22%-1.96%31.57%-13.52%19.99%
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
-6.51%19.85%31.94%16.07%-16.76%30.36%0.99%37.62%-12.56%24.47%

Correlation

The correlation between VFH and IYG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.97

The correlation between VFH and IYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFH vs. IYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFH
IYG

Financial Services

96.8%
100.0%

Technology

2.1%

-

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

VFH
96.8%
IYG
100.0%

Technology

VFH
2.1%
IYG

-

Real Estate

VFH
0.8%
IYG

-

Industrials

VFH
0.2%
IYG

-

Healthcare

VFH
0.1%
IYG

-

Communication Services

VFH
0.0%
IYG

-

Consumer Cyclical

VFH
0.0%
IYG

-

Basic Materials

VFH

-

IYG

-

Consumer Defensive

VFH

-

IYG

-

Energy

VFH

-

IYG

-

Utilities

VFH

-

IYG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFH vs. IYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

IYG
IYG Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYG Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYG Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFH vs. IYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFHIYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.07

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

0.36

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

0.93

-0.50

VFH vs. IYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFH Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the IYG Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFH and IYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFHIYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

0.37

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.39

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.57

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.22

+0.02

Drawdowns

VFH vs. IYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, roughly equal to the maximum IYG drawdown of -81.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and IYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFHIYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.61%

-81.84%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-15.90%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.30%

-18.54%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-29.62%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.42%

-44.32%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.24%

-9.77%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-20.75%

+2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.55%

6.09%

-0.54%

Volatility

VFH vs. IYG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) have volatilities of 3.34% and 3.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFHIYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

3.38%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.10%

11.78%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.79%

15.40%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.31%

20.43%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.54%

23.53%

-0.99%

VFH vs. IYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IYG's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFH vs. IYG - Dividend Comparison

VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than IYG's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
1.14%1.00%1.16%1.77%2.07%1.25%1.71%1.59%1.81%1.24%1.28%1.33%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.56%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, VFH and IYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IYG has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to VFH (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs IYG's -81.84%.

On 10-year performance, IYG leads with 13.37% vs 12.20% for VFH. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYG has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 12.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYG.

VFH has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.14% for IYG.

VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while IYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VFH and 0.42% for IYG.

IYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFH and IYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer