PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFH vs. IYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFH vs. IYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly higher than IYG's 6.15% return. Over the past 10 years, VFH has underperformed IYG with an annualized return of 13.37%, while IYG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.64% annualized return.


VFH

1D
0.89%
1M
4.10%
6M
9.11%
YTD
7.22%
1Y
13.83%
3Y*
20.82%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
13.37%
ALL TIME*
7.02%

IYG

1D
0.96%
1M
4.27%
6M
7.93%
YTD
6.15%
1Y
14.31%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
14.64%
ALL TIME*
6.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.02M$11.44M$10.05M
$53.77M$71.76M$72.54M

VFH vs. IYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
7.22%14.91%30.44%14.17%-12.31%35.22%-1.96%31.57%-13.52%19.99%
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
6.15%19.85%31.94%16.07%-16.76%30.36%0.99%37.62%-12.56%24.47%

Correlation

The correlation between VFH and IYG is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.97

The correlation between VFH and IYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFH vs. IYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFH
IYG

Financial Services

97.0%
100.0%

Technology

2.0%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

VFH
97.0%
IYG
100.0%

Technology

VFH
2.0%
IYG
0.0%

Real Estate

VFH
0.8%
IYG

-

Industrials

VFH
0.2%
IYG

-

Healthcare

VFH
0.1%
IYG

-

Communication Services

VFH
0.0%
IYG

-

Consumer Cyclical

VFH
0.0%
IYG

-

Basic Materials

VFH

-

IYG

-

Consumer Defensive

VFH

-

IYG

-

Energy

VFH

-

IYG

-

Utilities

VFH

-

IYG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFH vs. IYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

IYG
IYG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYG Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VFH vs. IYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFHIYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.17

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

0.90

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.45

2.30

+0.15

VFH vs. IYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFH Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the IYG Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFH and IYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFH vs. IYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, roughly equal to the maximum IYG drawdown of -81.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and IYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFHIYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.61%

-81.84%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-15.90%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.30%

-18.54%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-29.62%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.42%

-44.32%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.42%

-20.63%

+2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

6.25%

-0.58%

Volatility

VFH vs. IYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) is 3.94%, while iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that VFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFHIYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

4.49%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

12.00%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

15.75%

-0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.13%

20.34%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.48%

23.38%

-0.90%

VFH vs. IYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IYG's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFH vs. IYG - Dividend Comparison

VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than IYG's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
1.01%1.00%1.16%1.77%2.07%1.25%1.71%1.59%1.81%1.24%1.28%1.33%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.64%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, VFH and IYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IYG has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to VFH (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs IYG's -81.84%.

On 10-year performance, IYG leads with 14.64% vs 13.37% for VFH. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYG has performed better with a 14.64% return vs 13.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYG.

VFH has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.01% for IYG.

VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while IYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFH and 0.42% for IYG.

VFH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFH and IYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer