IYG vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
IYG and XLF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IYG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR. It was launched on Jun 12, 2000. XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both IYG and XLF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IYG or XLF.
Key characteristics
| IYG | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 23.66% | 24.49% |
| 1Y Return | 42.15% | 39.25% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.92% | 6.96% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.71% | 11.55% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.14% | 13.56% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.28 | 3.32 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.28 | 4.34 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.56 | 1.57 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.13 | 2.54 |
| Martin Ratio | 21.62 | 21.37 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.06% | 1.92% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.50% | 12.36% |
| Max Drawdown | -81.84% | -82.43% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.76% | -2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYG and XLF is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IYG vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IYG having a 23.66% return and XLF slightly higher at 24.49%. Over the past 10 years, IYG has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 11.14%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.56% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IYG vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IYG vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IYG vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
IYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than XLF's 1.44% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYG iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF | 1.25% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 1.25% | 1.71% | 1.59% | 1.81% | 1.24% | 1.28% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.04% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.44% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 2.40% | 1.98% | 1.81% |
Drawdowns
IYG vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYG drawdown since its inception was -81.84%, roughly equal to the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYG and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IYG vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) have volatilities of 3.95% and 3.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.