PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYG vs. IXG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYG vs. IXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYG achieves a -6.51% return, which is significantly lower than IXG's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, IYG has outperformed IXG with an annualized return of 13.37%, while IXG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.83% annualized return.


IYG

1D
-1.15%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
-6.51%
6M
-4.06%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
20.32%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
13.37%

IXG

1D
-1.08%
1M
0.73%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
3.74%
1Y
12.70%
3Y*
22.63%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
11.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYG vs. IXG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
-6.51%19.85%31.94%16.07%-16.76%30.36%0.99%37.62%-12.56%24.47%
IXG
iShares Global Financials ETF
-0.23%28.54%25.69%14.97%-8.97%25.07%-2.99%24.60%-16.33%23.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IYG and IXG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2001

0.85

The correlation between IYG and IXG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

IYG vs. IXG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYG
IXG

Financial Services

100.0%
97.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Industrials

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

IYG
100.0%
IXG
97.8%

Basic Materials

IYG

-

IXG

-

Communication Services

IYG

-

IXG

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYG

-

IXG
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

IYG

-

IXG

-

Energy

IYG

-

IXG
0.1%

Healthcare

IYG

-

IXG
0.1%

Industrials

IYG

-

IXG
0.2%

Real Estate

IYG

-

IXG

-

Technology

IYG

-

IXG
1.1%

Utilities

IYG

-

IXG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYG vs. IXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYG
IYG Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYG Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYG Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

IXG
IXG Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXG Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYG vs. IXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYGIXGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

0.93

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.59

1.40

-0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.16

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

1.13

-0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.93

3.97

-3.03

IYG vs. IXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYG Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the IXG Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYG and IXG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYGIXGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

0.93

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.64

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.59

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.24

-0.02

Drawdowns

IYG vs. IXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYG drawdown since its inception was -81.84%, roughly equal to the maximum IXG drawdown of -78.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYG and IXG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYGIXGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.84%

-78.42%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.90%

-11.33%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-13.54%

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-27.20%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

-43.47%

-0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.77%

-2.88%

-6.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.75%

-19.75%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.09%

3.21%

+2.88%

Volatility

IYG vs. IXG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) is 3.38%, while iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that IYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYGIXGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

3.70%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.78%

10.90%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.40%

13.67%

+1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

17.34%

+3.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.53%

20.12%

+3.41%

IYG vs. IXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than IXG's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYG vs. IXG - Dividend Comparison

IYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than IXG's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXG
iShares Global Financials ETF
2.05%2.04%2.64%2.62%3.71%1.69%2.13%2.87%3.14%2.12%2.21%2.79%
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
1.14%1.00%1.16%1.77%2.07%1.25%1.71%1.59%1.81%1.24%1.28%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYG and IXG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXG has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to IYG (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYG dropped -81.84% vs IXG's -78.42%.

On 10-year performance, IYG leads with 13.37% vs 11.83% for IXG. On fees, IYG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IYG has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYG has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXG.

IXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.14% for IYG.

IYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR, while IXG tracks S&P Global Financials Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYG and 0.46% for IXG.

IXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYG and IXG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer