PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEU vs. LQD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEU vs. LQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEU achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly higher than LQD's 0.88% return. Over the past 10 years, VEU has outperformed LQD with an annualized return of 10.23%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.


VEU

1D
3.33%
1M
1.64%
YTD
13.63%
6M
14.67%
1Y
29.07%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
10.23%

LQD

1D
0.85%
1M
0.86%
YTD
0.88%
6M
0.69%
1Y
5.82%
3Y*
5.17%
5Y*
-0.20%
10Y*
2.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEU vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
13.63%32.35%5.56%15.84%-15.58%8.27%11.10%21.83%-14.18%27.40%
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.88%7.90%0.86%9.40%-17.92%-1.84%10.97%17.37%-3.79%7.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VEU and LQD is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2007

0.10

Over the past year, VEU and LQD have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEU vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEU
VEU Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEU Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

LQD
LQD Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
LQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQD Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEU vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEULQDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.19

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

1.75

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.76

4.92

+4.84

VEU vs. LQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the LQD Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEU and LQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEU vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEU drawdown since its inception was -61.52%, which is greater than LQD's maximum drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEU and LQD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEULQDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.52%

-24.95%

-36.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-3.34%

-8.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-8.43%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.31%

-24.95%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

-24.95%

-10.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-3.31%

+1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.12%

-3.99%

-9.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

1.19%

+1.80%

Volatility

VEU vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) at 1.77%. This indicates that VEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEULQDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

1.77%

+5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

4.04%

+10.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

5.38%

+10.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

8.65%

+7.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

8.69%

+8.57%

VEU vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEU has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEU vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison

VEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than LQD's 4.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.55%4.48%4.45%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
2.63%3.09%3.24%3.32%3.12%3.08%2.00%3.10%3.27%2.66%2.96%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEU and LQD have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEU has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to LQD (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEU dropped -61.52% vs LQD's -24.95%.

On 10-year performance, VEU leads with 10.23% vs 2.53% for LQD. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, LQD has been the lower-risk option at 1.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEU has performed better with a 10.23% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for LQD.

LQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.55%, compared with 2.63% for VEU.

VEU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while LQD is Corporate Bonds. VEU tracks FTSE All-World ex US Index, while LQD tracks iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VEU and 0.15% for LQD.

VEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEU and LQD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer