VEU vs. ACWX
VEU (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF) and ACWX (iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - VEU tracks the FTSE All-World ex US Index while ACWX tracks the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEU returned 10.40%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for ACWX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VEU charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWX.
Performance
VEU vs. ACWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VEU having a 13.01% return and ACWX slightly lower at 12.88%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEU having a 10.40% annualized return and ACWX not far behind at 10.06%.
VEU
- 1D
- -3.06%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 13.01%
- 6M
- 12.81%
- 1Y
- 30.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.26%
- 5Y*
- 8.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
ACWX
- 1D
- -3.17%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 29.85%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
VEU vs. ACWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 13.01% | 32.35% | 5.56% | 15.84% | -15.58% | 8.27% | 11.10% | 21.83% | -14.18% | 27.40% |
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 12.88% | 32.59% | 5.17% | 15.63% | -16.07% | 7.67% | 10.29% | 21.05% | -13.99% | 27.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEU and ACWX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008 | 0.98 |
The correlation between VEU and ACWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
VEU vs. ACWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEU
ACWX
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
VEU
ACWX
Technology
VEU
ACWX
Industrials
VEU
ACWX
Consumer Cyclical
VEU
ACWX
Basic Materials
VEU
ACWX
Healthcare
VEU
ACWX
Consumer Defensive
VEU
ACWX
Energy
VEU
ACWX
Communication Services
VEU
ACWX
Utilities
VEU
ACWX
Real Estate
VEU
ACWX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEU vs. ACWX — Risk / Return Rank
VEU
ACWX
VEU vs. ACWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEU | ACWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.62 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.12 | 10.05 | +0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEU vs. ACWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEU drawdown since its inception was -61.52%, roughly equal to the maximum ACWX drawdown of -60.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEU and ACWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEU | ACWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.52% | -60.40% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -11.42% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.69% | -13.84% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -29.78% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.98% | -35.38% | +0.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | -3.17% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.10% | -13.30% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.98% | 0.00% |
Volatility
VEU vs. ACWX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) have volatilities of 7.10% and 7.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEU | ACWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.10% | 7.37% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.47% | 14.77% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.44% | 16.74% | -0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 16.53% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 17.27% | -0.19% |
VEU vs. ACWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEU has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWX's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEU vs. ACWX - Dividend Comparison
VEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, which matches ACWX's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 2.54% | 2.82% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 2.68% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 3.22% | 2.60% | 2.40% | 2.77% | 2.51% |
VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 2.56% | 3.09% | 3.24% | 3.32% | 3.12% | 3.08% | 2.00% | 3.10% | 3.27% | 2.66% | 2.96% | 2.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, VEU and ACWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ACWX has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to VEU (7.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEU dropped -61.52% vs ACWX's -60.40%.
On 10-year performance, VEU leads with 10.40% vs 10.06% for ACWX. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VEU has been the lower-risk option at 7.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VEU has performed better with a 10.40% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.
VEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 2.54% for ACWX.
VEU tracks FTSE All-World ex US Index, while ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VEU and 0.32% for ACWX.
VEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEU and ACWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer