PortfoliosLab logo
LQD vs. HYG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LQD and HYG is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LQD vs. HYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

LQD:

5.28%

HYG:

1.22%

Max Drawdown

LQD:

-0.54%

HYG:

-0.08%

Current Drawdown

LQD:

-0.54%

HYG:

0.00%

Returns By Period


LQD

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

HYG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LQD vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQD vs. HYG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQD is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQD is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQD is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQD is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQD is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQD is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

HYG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HYG is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HYG is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HYG is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HYG is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HYG is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HYG is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LQD vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

LQD vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison

LQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than HYG's 5.89% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LQD vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQD drawdown since its inception was -0.54%, which is greater than HYG's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQD and HYG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LQD vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...