LQD vs. VCLT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT).
LQD and VCLT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LQD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. It was launched on Jul 26, 2002. VCLT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Index. It was launched on Nov 19, 2009. Both LQD and VCLT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LQD or VCLT.
Correlation
The correlation between LQD and VCLT is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
LQD vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
LQD:
0.60
VCLT:
0.16
LQD:
0.86
VCLT:
0.27
LQD:
1.10
VCLT:
1.03
LQD:
0.30
VCLT:
0.07
LQD:
1.59
VCLT:
0.34
LQD:
2.74%
VCLT:
4.70%
LQD:
7.49%
VCLT:
11.56%
LQD:
-24.95%
VCLT:
-34.31%
LQD:
-10.00%
VCLT:
-21.15%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQD achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than VCLT's -0.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LQD having a 2.45% annualized return and VCLT not far behind at 2.38%.
LQD
1.32%
-0.03%
-0.76%
4.46%
-0.01%
2.45%
VCLT
-0.36%
-1.07%
-4.06%
1.79%
-1.75%
2.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LQD vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LQD vs. VCLT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LQD
VCLT
LQD vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
LQD vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison
LQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than VCLT's 5.43% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.50% | 4.45% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% | 3.39% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.43% | 5.19% | 4.67% | 4.44% | 3.07% | 3.16% | 3.81% | 4.55% | 4.01% | 4.33% | 4.68% | 4.29% |
Drawdowns
LQD vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQD drawdown since its inception was -24.95%, smaller than the maximum VCLT drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQD and VCLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
LQD vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...