PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LQD vs. VCLT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LQDVCLT
YTD Return1.49%-0.36%
1Y Return8.69%10.04%
3Y Return (Ann)-2.74%-5.87%
5Y Return (Ann)0.13%-1.30%
10Y Return (Ann)2.48%2.63%
Sharpe Ratio1.291.03
Sortino Ratio1.891.51
Omega Ratio1.221.18
Calmar Ratio0.540.42
Martin Ratio4.413.11
Ulcer Index2.18%3.63%
Daily Std Dev7.42%10.91%
Max Drawdown-24.95%-34.31%
Current Drawdown-10.62%-19.64%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between LQD and VCLT is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

LQD vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LQD achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than VCLT's -0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, LQD has underperformed VCLT with an annualized return of 2.48%, while VCLT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.63% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.22%
2.97%
LQD
VCLT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LQD vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for LQD: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for VCLT: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQD vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LQD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LQD, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.29
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LQD, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.89
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LQD, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LQD, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.54
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LQD, currently valued at 4.41, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.004.41
VCLT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VCLT, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VCLT, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.51
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VCLT, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VCLT, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.42
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VCLT, currently valued at 3.11, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.003.11

LQD vs. VCLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQD Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the VCLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQD and VCLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.29
1.03
LQD
VCLT

Dividends

LQD vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison

LQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than VCLT's 5.01% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.41%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%3.39%3.83%
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.01%4.67%4.44%3.07%3.16%3.81%4.55%4.01%4.33%4.68%4.29%4.83%

Drawdowns

LQD vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQD drawdown since its inception was -24.95%, smaller than the maximum VCLT drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQD and VCLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-10.62%
-19.64%
LQD
VCLT

Volatility

LQD vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) is 2.49%, while Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that LQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.49%
3.85%
LQD
VCLT