LQD vs. TLT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT).
LQD and TLT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LQD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. It was launched on Jul 26, 2002. TLT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Bond Index. It was launched on Jul 26, 2002. Both LQD and TLT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LQD or TLT.
Key characteristics
| LQD | TLT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.49% | -5.85% |
| 1Y Return | 8.69% | 4.54% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.74% | -12.05% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 0.13% | -5.85% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.48% | -0.34% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.29 | 0.40 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.89 | 0.65 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.22 | 1.07 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.54 | 0.13 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.41 | 0.95 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.18% | 6.17% |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.42% | 14.79% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.95% | -48.35% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.62% | -41.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQD and TLT is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LQD vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LQD achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -5.85% return. Over the past 10 years, LQD has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 2.48%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -0.34% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LQD vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LQD and TLT have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LQD vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LQD vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
LQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than TLT's 4.08% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.41% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% | 3.39% | 3.83% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.08% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% | 2.67% | 3.26% |
Drawdowns
LQD vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQD drawdown since its inception was -24.95%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQD and TLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LQD vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) is 2.49%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that LQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.