PortfoliosLab logo
LQD vs. TLT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LQD and TLT is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LQD vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LQD:

0.60

TLT:

0.01

Sortino Ratio

LQD:

0.86

TLT:

0.09

Omega Ratio

LQD:

1.10

TLT:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

LQD:

0.30

TLT:

-0.00

Martin Ratio

LQD:

1.59

TLT:

-0.01

Ulcer Index

LQD:

2.74%

TLT:

7.81%

Daily Std Dev

LQD:

7.49%

TLT:

14.43%

Max Drawdown

LQD:

-24.95%

TLT:

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

LQD:

-10.00%

TLT:

-42.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQD achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's 1.08% return. Over the past 10 years, LQD has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 2.46%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -0.54% annualized return.


LQD

YTD

1.32%

1M

1.70%

6M

-0.76%

1Y

4.79%

5Y*

0.17%

10Y*

2.46%

TLT

YTD

1.08%

1M

1.10%

6M

-3.86%

1Y

0.64%

5Y*

-9.36%

10Y*

-0.54%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LQD vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LQD and TLT have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQD vs. TLT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQD is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQD is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQD is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQD is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQD is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQD is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TLT is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TLT is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TLT is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TLT is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TLT is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TLT is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LQD vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LQD Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQD and TLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

LQD vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

LQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than TLT's 4.35% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.50%4.45%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%3.39%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.35%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%2.67%

Drawdowns

LQD vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQD drawdown since its inception was -24.95%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQD and TLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LQD vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) is 2.79%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that LQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...