LQD vs. IEF
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF).
LQD and IEF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LQD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. It was launched on Jul 26, 2002. IEF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index. It was launched on Jul 26, 2002. Both LQD and IEF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LQD or IEF.
Key characteristics
| LQD | IEF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.40% | -3.01% |
| 1Y Return | 1.97% | -4.76% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.53% | -4.79% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 0.98% | -0.81% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.24% | 0.86% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.19 | -0.59 |
| Daily Std Dev | 8.88% | 8.11% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.95% | -23.93% |
| Current Drawdown | -14.04% | -19.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQD and IEF is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LQD vs. IEF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LQD achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly higher than IEF's -3.01% return. Over the past 10 years, LQD has outperformed IEF with an annualized return of 2.24%, while IEF has yielded a comparatively lower 0.86% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LQD vs. IEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LQD and IEF have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LQD vs. IEF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LQD vs. IEF - Dividend Comparison
LQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than IEF's 3.24% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.33% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% | 3.39% | 3.83% |
IEF iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.24% | 2.91% | 1.96% | 0.83% | 1.08% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 1.82% | 1.81% | 1.90% | 2.05% | 1.77% |
Drawdowns
LQD vs. IEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQD drawdown since its inception was -24.95%, roughly equal to the maximum IEF drawdown of -23.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQD and IEF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LQD vs. IEF - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) at 2.31%. This indicates that LQD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.