PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VELO vs. EQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VELO vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Velo3D, Inc (VELO) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VELO achieves a -26.27% return, which is significantly lower than EQT's -0.02% return.


VELO

1D
4.38%
1M
-35.19%
6M
-23.08%
YTD
-26.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

EQT

1D
1.10%
1M
1.29%
6M
-7.17%
YTD
-0.02%
1Y
3.01%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
25.41%
10Y*
4.27%
ALL TIME*
10.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$436.52M$391.65M$390.40M
$14.71M$20.98M$70.22M

VELO vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
VELO
Velo3D, Inc
-26.27%388.97%
EQT
EQT Corporation
-0.02%6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between VELO and EQT is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

-0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VELO:

$196.48M

EQT:

$33.33B

EPS

VELO:

-$0.84

EQT:

$4.55

PS Ratio

VELO:

6.11

EQT:

3.59

PB Ratio

VELO:

4.92

EQT:

1.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

VELO:

$13.85B

EQT:

$9.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VELO:

$2.37B

EQT:

$6.78B

EBITDA (TTM)

VELO:

-$6.98B

EQT:

$6.93B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Velo3D, Inc

EQT Corporation

Return for Risk

VELO vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VELO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


EQT
EQT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VELO vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Velo3D, Inc (VELO) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VELOEQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.02

VELO vs. EQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VELO vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VELO drawdown since its inception was -72.43%, smaller than the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VELO and EQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VELOEQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.43%

-91.51%

+19.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.91%

-21.33%

-45.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.40%

-23.34%

-7.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.69%

Volatility

VELO vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VELOEQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

190.33%

30.59%

+159.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

190.33%

42.13%

+148.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

190.33%

48.96%

+141.37%

Dividends

VELO vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

VELO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQT
EQT Corporation
1.22%1.19%1.37%1.57%1.63%0.00%0.24%1.10%0.42%0.21%0.18%0.23%
VELO
Velo3D, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VELO vs. EQT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Velo3D, Inc and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

VELO vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Velo3D, Inc and EQT Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

VELO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Velo3D, Inc reported a gross profit of 2.38B and revenue of 13.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.2%.

EQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.7%.

VELO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Velo3D, Inc reported an operating income of -6.95B and revenue of 13.82B, resulting in an operating margin of -50.3%.

EQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 394.04M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.

VELO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Velo3D, Inc reported a net income of -7.00B and revenue of 13.82B, resulting in a net margin of -50.7%.

EQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 281.45M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VELO and EQT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VELO and EQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer