PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. SPDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VEA having a 15.19% return and SPDW slightly higher at 15.36%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VEA having a 10.13% annualized return and SPDW not far behind at 10.05%.


VEA

1D
0.24%
1M
4.15%
YTD
15.19%
6M
18.13%
1Y
32.11%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
10.13%

SPDW

1D
0.31%
1M
4.15%
YTD
15.36%
6M
18.10%
1Y
31.87%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
10.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
15.19%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
15.36%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%9.90%22.41%-14.22%25.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and SPDW is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.95

The correlation between VEA and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEA vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
SPDW

Financial Services

23.3%
22.9%

Industrials

19.2%
19.2%

Technology

13.8%
13.7%

Healthcare

8.2%
8.3%

Basic Materials

7.5%
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
5.7%

Energy

5.4%
5.5%

Communication Services

3.4%
3.8%

Utilities

3.3%
3.3%

Real Estate

2.7%
2.5%

Financial Services

VEA
23.3%
SPDW
22.9%

Industrials

VEA
19.2%
SPDW
19.2%

Technology

VEA
13.8%
SPDW
13.7%

Healthcare

VEA
8.2%
SPDW
8.3%

Basic Materials

VEA
7.5%
SPDW
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.5%
SPDW
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.6%
SPDW
5.7%

Energy

VEA
5.4%
SPDW
5.5%

Communication Services

VEA
3.4%
SPDW
3.8%

Utilities

VEA
3.3%
SPDW
3.3%

Real Estate

VEA
2.7%
SPDW
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEASPDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.77

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.82

10.83

-0.02

VEA vs. SPDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the SPDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and SPDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEASPDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

2.06

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.58

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.58

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.24

+0.01

Drawdowns

VEA vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, roughly equal to the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and SPDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEASPDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-60.02%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-11.55%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-13.53%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-30.21%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-34.98%

-0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.56%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-12.91%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.95%

+0.03%

Volatility

VEA vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) have volatilities of 5.49% and 5.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEASPDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

5.44%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.32%

13.17%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.64%

15.58%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

16.49%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

17.25%

+0.10%

VEA vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEA vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than SPDW's 2.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
2.86%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.61%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, VEA and SPDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to SPDW (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs SPDW's -60.02%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.13% vs 10.05% for SPDW. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.13% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SPDW.

SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 2.61% for VEA.

VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.04% for SPDW.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and SPDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer