PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDW vs. FNDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPDW vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPDW vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
2.79%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%9.90%22.41%-14.22%25.81%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
8.23%40.99%2.29%20.22%-7.78%14.97%3.61%18.46%-14.21%23.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDW achieves a 2.79% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 8.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SPDW has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 9.30%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.


SPDW

1D
3.30%
1M
-8.46%
YTD
2.79%
6M
8.61%
1Y
29.84%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
9.30%

FNDF

1D
2.95%
1M
-7.26%
YTD
8.23%
6M
17.33%
1Y
40.22%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPDW vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDW has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SPDW vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDW vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDWFNDFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

2.31

-0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.34

3.02

-0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.46

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.52

-1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.76

13.78

-4.02

SPDW vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDW and FNDF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDWFNDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

2.31

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.78

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.63

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.49

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between SPDW and FNDF is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SPDW vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

SPDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, which matches FNDF's 3.18% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
3.21%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
3.18%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%

Drawdowns

SPDW vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDW drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDW and FNDF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDWFNDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.02%

-40.14%

-19.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-11.08%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

-25.56%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

-40.14%

+5.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.63%

-7.26%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.01%

-7.72%

-5.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

2.83%

+0.11%

Volatility

SPDW vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) have volatilities of 8.31% and 8.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPDWFNDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.31%

8.06%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.51%

11.42%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.57%

17.50%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

16.05%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

17.64%

-0.49%